Talk:The Other Conquest

This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Indigenous peoples of the Americas Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Indigenous peoples of the Americas, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Indigenous peoples of the Americas on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Indigenous peoples of the AmericasWikipedia:WikiProject Indigenous peoples of the AmericasTemplate:WikiProject Indigenous peoples of the AmericasIndigenous peoples of the Americas articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. Film: Mexican Start‑class This article is supported by the Mexican cinema task force. inactive .MesoamericaWikipedia:WikiProject MesoamericaTemplate:WikiProject MesoamericaMesoamerica articles

Mexico

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Mexico, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Mexico on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.MexicoWikipedia:WikiProject MexicoTemplate:WikiProject MexicoMexico articles ??? This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on The Other Conquest. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20080704145443/http://www.mysanantonio.com/entertainment/columnists/lratliff/stories/MYSA050407.WK.conquest.be84c4.html to http://www.mysanantonio.com/entertainment/columnists/lratliff/stories/MYSA050407.WK.conquest.be84c4.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018.

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 15:31, 29 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The film here has a lot of the same problems as its director's article, and both appear to have been written by the director himself. Both also have self-promotional "peacock" language.

Since almost all of the information here has no sources or citations, and appears to have been sourced by the director itself (therefore self-promotional), I will go ahead and remove all the information without citation. Almost all of the information here appears unfit for Wikipedia's policies of verifiability

Many of the issues with this article are the same as the one for its director (see: Talk:Salvador_Carrasco), so I will be brief: almost all of the information returned here is sourceless, and the information that does have sources go to dead links (including all the reviews from the "top critics"). I will remove all of that info right away.

Also, this new editor @Alcirengifo115 is evidently associated with the director of this film (again, see: Talk:Salvador_Carrasco), so his contributions that he has spammed with the summary "I am a Rotten Tomatoes-approved film critic conducting research on Mr. Carrasco's film and this is accurate, verified information that should be included in his profile page." will also be deleted (note how the editor forgot to remove the 'profile page' part for his contributions for this article).

I will say again: Wikipedia is not meant to be a promotional profile that anyone and their friends can fluff up for their own self-promotion, and this includes a person's work. Bagabondo (talk) 04:47, 3 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]