This article is within the scope of WikiProject Disney, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of The Walt Disney Company and its affiliated companies on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.DisneyWikipedia:WikiProject DisneyTemplate:WikiProject DisneyDisney articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Animation, a collaborative effort to build an encyclopedic guide to animation on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, help out with the open tasks, or contribute to the discussion.AnimationWikipedia:WikiProject AnimationTemplate:WikiProject AnimationAnimation articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions.
"three short cartoon segments of normal length and a short that is about 20 minutes": What is "normal length"? Does anyone know how much animation there is in this film in total? Esn 07:11, 10 June 2006 (UTC)
Yes, please define "normal" length. Das Baz, aka Erudil 19:28, 19 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Removal of "needs infobox" tag
This article has had its infobox tag removed by a cleanup using AWB.
Any concerns please leave me a message at my talk page. RWardy 17:46, 12 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Copy removal, edit warring and 3RR violations
Hello,
WP:3RR in the process. I've checked your talk page and see that other's have queried your editing on this article and others, but you don't seem prepared to engage with them either there or on the talk pages of the articles in question. Perhaps if you followed good practice, WP:Etiquette and/or were more forthcoming about what you are attempting to accomplish and why you are so uncompromising about other editor's efforts which challenge your own views, many of these problems could be avoided? Please approach this as an attempt to resolve this situation in a reasonable manner. If you continue as you are at the moment, however, then I believe reporting you for your edit warring and 3RR violations will become inevitable. Bowdenford (talk) 09:25, 8 June 2013 (UTC)[reply
]
Critical assessment?
I've just seen this movie for the first time. The thing that struck me the most in the Reluctant Dragon animated sequence was the heavy reliance on effeminacy and gay stereotypes. Has no one written about this? kosboot (talk) 17:01, 28 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Oh, it is oh so obvious that the Dragon is Gay. Only Gay Dragon ever, maybe. But if you dared to say so in Wikipedia, you'd be accused of that horrible sin and crime, "Original Research." Das Baz, aka Erudil 19:24, 19 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]
.svg){kind=small}
