Talk:The Return of Sherlock Holmes

This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Novels: Short story / Crime High‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Novels, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to novels, novellas, novelettes and short stories on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and contribute to the general Project discussion to talk over new ideas and suggestions.NovelsWikipedia:WikiProject NovelsTemplate:WikiProject Novelsnovel articles High This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale. This article is supported by Short story task force. This article is supported by Crime task force (assessed as High-importance). Books Media franchises: Sherlock Holmes High‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Media franchises, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics related to media franchises on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Media franchisesWikipedia:WikiProject Media franchisesTemplate:WikiProject Media franchisesmedia franchise articles High This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale. This article is supported by WikiProject Sherlock Holmes (assessed as High-importance).

This article was automatically assessed because at least one WikiProject had rated the article as start, and the rating on other projects was brought up to start class. BetacommandBot 13:52, 9 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

See

The first paragraph says that it was originally published in 1903-1904, but the history section claims it was first published in 1905. Which is it? Atypicaloracle (talk) 11:20, 6 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The stories themselves were published in the Strand magazine in 1903 to 1904. They were then revised and collected into book form in 1905. 2.31.162.87 (talk) 15:43, 1 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I went through and edited the story summaries to reflect a more formal and encyclopedic style. I'm not totally happy with the results, but I think the section is enough better to justify removing the "tone" template. If anyone disagrees, feel free to put it back (and edit some more). Worldwalker (talk) 17:00, 16 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]