Talk:The Stuff

This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Film: American This article is supported by the American cinema task force. Comedy This article is within the scope of WikiProject Comedy, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of comedy on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ComedyWikipedia:WikiProject ComedyTemplate:WikiProject ComedyComedy articles ??? This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale. Horror This article is within the scope of WikiProject Horror, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to fictional horror in film, literature and other media on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can edit one of the articles mentioned below, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and contribute to the general Project discussion to talk over new ideas and suggestions.HorrorWikipedia:WikiProject HorrorTemplate:WikiProject Horrorhorror articles ??? This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Is this gratitously disgusting screenshot necessary? VarunRajendran

Actually, it does convey the premise rather well. -EmiOfBrie 22:58, 30 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Necessary? No. Disgusting? Yes. Awesome? Hell yeah! :D

Actually now that I think of it, the picture would be better off replaced, not because of content, but rather because the picture is a spoiler. We're not supposed to know what became of that character until near the very end -EmiOfBrie 12:44, 4 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Most of the movie articles on wikipedia contain spoilers though. ~ IICATSII 17:35, 6 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, but they also contain headings warning such that can be easily seen. There really is no way you can spoiler warn that picture, it just sorta jumps out at you. -EmiOfBrie 17:46, 6 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The whole thing needs a clean up, I’ll make an attempt at it sometime today. ~ IICATSII 07:19, 8 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Well it is the DVD cover, so if you brought the DVD you would be getting a spoiler just by purchasing it. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 202.3.37.199 (talk) 11:08, 1 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Just for the record, Wikipedia doesn't concern itself with spoilers. Lots42 (talk) 03:27, 5 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

How is this related to the Incredible Shrinking Woman?

Innocuous household product causes horrible transformation.

18.10.2009 —Preceding unsigned comment added by 85.2.128.182 (talk) 17:34, 18 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Speculation is speculation. Lots42 (talk) 03:28, 5 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The McFlurry wasn't 'invented' until 1997, a full 12 years after the movie released, so no. 170.170.59.138 (talk) 02:43, 31 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Michael Moriarty (looking VERY young)/ADA Ben Stone and Paul Sorvino/Sgt. Phil Ceretta, a mere five years before Law & Order started filming. The big question is, did Michael Moriarty lose all that hair in five years, or was he already wearing a rug in this film? Serious question (trivia-wise). That aside, filing suit against the company that made/marketed/harvested The Stuff is more Sam Waterston's style, not Ben Stone's. 'Course, neither is blowing things up... —Preceding unsigned comment added by 76.246.198.30 (talk) 02:37, 10 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I was an extra in The Stuff, (the radio exec yelled at by Col. Spears). Anyway, spent a bit of time, talking between takes with Michael Moriarity, Paul Sorvino and Garret Morris. I can assure you, Michael Moriarity's hair was real at the time. No toupee or wig that I detected. Trivia Andre (talk) 18:53, 25 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

That comment's from 12 years ago in any case. But we also wouldn't have any way to verify your credentials and would need a

reliable source, though there's nothing in the article about this one way or another, that I saw. DonIago (talk) 17:29, 26 August 2022 (UTC)[reply

]

On 19 April 2014, I uploaded this image file, which displays an edited version of The Stuff's logo. I was wondering what to do in order to replace the file with the image found here, and if anyone else agrees that the image should be replaced. -- Matthew - (talk · userpage · contributions) 16:37, 9 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]