Talk:The Ways of Fate
 | The Ways of Fate has been listed as one of the Media and drama good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it. Review: January 12, 2014. (Reviewed version). |
 | This article is rated GA-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||
GA Review
| GA toolbox |
|---|
| Reviewing |
- This review is transcluded from Talk:The Ways of Fate/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.
Reviewer: Good888 (talk · contribs) 14:52, 9 January 2015 (UTC)
Here is my review of this lost film article:
Production and release
- "The film was released on April 19, 1913, by the American Film Manufacturing Company" You already linked American Film Manufacturing Company in the Plot section.
Release and legacy
- "The film saw widespread release in the United States with Washington D.C., Utah, Pennsylvania, Texas, Kansas, North Carolina, and Missouri." Link all of the places.
- "The film was also released internationally with ads in Manitoba, Canada and in London, United Kingdom." Change ads to advertisements.
- "Wouldn't it be interesting if Chaney worked at a studio other than Universal in 1913!" I think you should link Universal.
Images
- Do you have any confirmed images of this film?
References
- Unlink the red links.
I will promote once the issues above are addressed. good888 (talk) 10:49, 10 January 2015 (UTC)
- All fixes done except the red links - not all red links are bad here. I did delink one and fixed a bad disambiguation on another. Also, @Good888: - I will always include a relevant film still or poster if I have one that can be used since the entire film will be out of copyright and some were never copyrighted in the first place. Some like The Restless Spirit have one or two and Gnome Motion Picture Company will get multiple. I always try to get everything I can and do my best to get relevant and decent images if at all possible. Thanks for checking all these films out! ChrisGualtieri (talk) 05:23, 12 January 2015 (UTC)
- OK, I will promote to GA class. Note that I always ask just to be on the safe side of things, although I don't necessary need to according to the Good article criteria. good888 (talk) 19:40, 12 January 2015 (UTC)
- Oh okay. Thanks for checking. ChrisGualtieri (talk) 06:26, 13 January 2015 (UTC)
- OK, I will promote to GA class. Note that I always ask just to be on the safe side of things, although I don't necessary need to according to the Good article criteria. good888 (talk) 19:40, 12 January 2015 (UTC)
- All fixes done except the red links - not all red links are bad here. I did delink one and fixed a bad disambiguation on another. Also, @Good888: - I will always include a relevant film still or poster if I have one that can be used since the entire film will be out of copyright and some were never copyrighted in the first place. Some like The Restless Spirit have one or two and Gnome Motion Picture Company will get multiple. I always try to get everything I can and do my best to get relevant and decent images if at all possible. Thanks for checking all these films out! ChrisGualtieri (talk) 05:23, 12 January 2015 (UTC)