Talk:There's Got to Be a Morning After Pill
Good topic candidate | Promoted |
A fact from this article appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the "Did you know?" column on January 31, 2016.
The text of the entry was: Did you know ... that Rob Thomas had envisioned the main plot for "There's Got to Be a Morning After Pill", an episode of Veronica Mars
, since before the beginning of the third season?This article is rated GA-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||
|
GA Review
GA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
- This review is transcluded from Talk:There's Got to Be a Morning After Pill/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.
Reviewer: Miyagawa (talk · contribs) 14:05, 3 January 2016 (UTC)
Ok, running through a review now. I've run the dash tool and fixed one duplicate link.
- Image licence is good.
- Lead: I like the inclusion of the series summary in the first paragraph rather than the second as it helps balance the size of the three. I might have to borrow that idea for my Star Trek articles.
- Yeah, it was indirectly suggested by a reviewer who thought that I should make my first paragraphs longer.
- Production: You repeat "marking" in the same context twice in successive sentences. Can you re-write one to stop it coming off as repetitive?
- Done changed the structure of the second appearance. Johanna(talk to me!) 22:08, 3 January 2016 (UTC)
- Reviews: "great" needs a direct citation.
- "Like last week's episode, 'There's Got to Be a Morning After Pill' benefited from integrating already established characters into a mystery of the week." needs a direct citation.
- "jam-packed with drama" needs a direct citation.
- "one of the weakest that the show has ever done." needs a direct citation.
- Television Without Pity is in italics in the cite, but not in the body of the article.
- Done with all. Johanna(talk to me!) 22:08, 3 January 2016 (UTC)
Once those issues are corrected, I think this article will be good to go for GA. Miyagawa (talk) 14:05, 3 January 2016 (UTC)
- @Miyagawa: I believe that I have responded to all comments and concerns. I don't know if you have any GANs, but if you do, I would be happy to review one (or more). If you could respond on my FL, that would be great as well. Johanna(talk to me!) 22:08, 3 January 2016 (UTC)