Talk:Throckley Hall

This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Historic sites Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Historic sites, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of historic sites on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Historic sitesWikipedia:WikiProject Historic sitesTemplate:WikiProject Historic sitesHistoric sites articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. England Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject England, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of England on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.EnglandWikipedia:WikiProject EnglandTemplate:WikiProject EnglandEngland-related articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

See User talk:TechnoSquirrel69/Archive 6 § Query Re: Undisclosed Paid Tag. —TechnoSquirrel69 (sigh) 23:51, 1 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I would like to open a discussion related to the tag indicating possible close association between myself (a major contributor) and this article. The user @TechnoSquirrel69 kindly reviewed this recent article submission and added the tag. I have discussed this on their Talk page and clarified that my username (ThrockleyH) relates to our local historical society (Throckley Historical - AKA - ThrockleyH online username), I am grateful for TechnoSquirrel69 having promptly adjusted the tag as a result of our discussion. I have attempted to keep this article as neutral as possible and presented the facts as were able to be discerned from local research, with as best citations as possible.

If any user / reviewer were able to assess this article and advise as to any elements that could be inappropriate or non-neutral that may require adjustment, I would be most grateful.

When drafting this article (the first time I have done so) I attempted to follow and draw guidance from other similar articles relating to historical properties / houses that have previously been approved and are live on Wikipedia. I attempted to ensure the layout and nature of this article covered the topics of interest from my local research and would provide interesting reading and information to those whom may view the article in future. I would hope that the reading of the article maintains a neutral perspective and presents the information in a factual way. Similar to articles such as (Dunstall Hall, West Grange Hall, Wallington Hall).

To clarify further, the subject of the article is not a business or any form of commercial enterprise, it is a residential private property, much the same as the other articles I mention above.

I have reviewed the Template:COI page and would be grateful for any guidance as to any particular element that may be deemed "non-neutral". I would welcome guidance and any adjustments felt necessary. Many thanks.

@KrisBlk: After your explanation and username change, I'm convinced that you don't appear to have a conflict of interest with the subject, and I've removed the tag with that in mind. I sincerely appreciate your efforts to research and create this article, as well as to make sure you're doing everything in accordance with applicable policies and guidelines as much as possible! —TechnoSquirrel69 (sigh) 05:37, 2 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@TechnoSquirrel69 Thank you very much for your guidance and assistance. I'm pleased to hear we have resolved the COI query. It has been an excellent learning experience for myself as a new editor and I shall take forwards the learning points for future contributions. I appreciate the positive feedback and the Barnstar, that is very kind of you.

Many thanks again.

KrisBlk (talk) 06:55, 2 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]