Talk:To Rome with Love (film)

Page contents not supported in other languages.
Source: Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.

Vignette mislabeling

Instead of an old architect who returns to the street he used to live it should say it's about a young architect who must decide between his live-in girlfriend and an actress. 200.124.54.49 (talk) 01:44, 27 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Plot Summary

The plot summary is neither too detailed nor is it too long. I suggest removal of plot tag. Flaviusvulso (talk) 03:55, 21 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I agree. -- Michael Bednarek (talk) 09:46, 21 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

critics

...do expect most of the time news.For me a real well made comedy, driving me laughing to tears by the shower scenes, has#nt got a fitting measure. Stair case jokes on opera and questioning fame as a phanenomen is new, but may be they don#t like (W)right questions... — Preceding unsigned comment added by Ai-mu-mu (talkcontribs) 14:55, 2 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

John’s story

John and Jack are actually the same person. John revisits the places of his youth and reminisces about his alter ego of the past. John only has an afternoon to spend, how else could he follow Jack’s affaire which spans several days if not weeks. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 46.115.113.184 (talk) 16:36, 22 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Magical realist film?

Why is this film labeled as a magical realist romantic comedy film? I really can't find anything magical or not likely to happen in it. The story played by Roberto Benigni is a bit non-sensical (surely not magical) but this is a comedy. Can someone help me to find the "magical realist" part in any other story? Marty5550 (talk) 17:02, 13 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]