Talk:Tzu Chi

This article is rated B-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Buddhism Low‑importance This article falls within the scope of WikiProject Buddhism, an attempt to promote better coordination, content distribution, and cross-referencing between pages dealing with Buddhism. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page for more details on the projects.BuddhismWikipedia:WikiProject BuddhismTemplate:WikiProject BuddhismBuddhism articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. Organizations on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.OrganizationsWikipedia:WikiProject OrganizationsTemplate:WikiProject Organizationsorganization articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Taiwan High‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Taiwan, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Taiwan on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.TaiwanWikipedia:WikiProject TaiwanTemplate:WikiProject TaiwanTaiwan articles High This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.

Graphs are unavailable due to technical issues. There is more info on Phabricator and on MediaWiki.org.

This article has a lot of advertising language. I am going to do some modifications to it. Jh1234l (talk) 19:51, 16 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The use of the term cult seems excessive and perhaps unwarranted. 14:40, 30 June 2007 66.90.144.204

A remark on this point (which seems to have been resolved earlier): Like many other organizations, a group may arise from the work of a charismatic leader. However, as discussed in organizational theory, many other groups seek to make the transition beyond the founding generation. In this respect, Tzu Chi has actually focused on institutionalization of its work, not personalization, so I agree with the assessment of the above. 128.12.217.243 (talk) 18:46, 30 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I included a segment on Tzu Chi Foundation's missions, briefly outlining their core focuses and areas of contributions. I also named the last paragraph, with a temporary title as "Public Opinion". I was unable to find an official english translation of some of the specific terms, however, so I translated them to the best of my knowledge.Gawdlike (talk) 19:23, 19 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Saying that criticism ENDED after the 921 Earthquake is propaganda at best. There was still criticism after 921, and there still is, especially in wake of the recent economic situation where an increasing number of Taiwanese were upset that Tzu Chi still spends massive amounts in China when Taiwan is in financial turmoil. Anyone whom reads the Taiwanese papers knows that.--24.193.80.232 (talk) 18:03, 13 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The word used in the public opinion section is "subsided", not "ENDED". If we can carry out a poll, I am sure you would see a clear shift of attitude [among the Taiwanese populace] towards the charity work carried out by Tzu Chi volunteers in China. Under the current political situation in Taiwan, it is not possible to accomplish anything without arousing skepticism or criticism. Even in Hualien, where the first Tzu Chi hospital is built, there are people thinking that Tzu Chi hospital should treat all patients free because the hospital was built with donated money from a lot of people. Obviously, the hospital would soon have to be closed if that's the case. The focus is helping needed people in addition to providing quality medical services in the remote eastern part of Taiwan. There will always be disagreements from people but it is very safe to say that most Taiwanese people appreciate the good deeds by Tzu Chi Foundation and its massive fleet of volunteers. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 118.160.219.98 (talk) 03:59, 20 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, this sounds like an issue of word choice and "subsided" is now in the article.128.12.217.243 (talk) 18:46, 30 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I went through the sourced article here and it says absolutely nothing about the public opinion of Tzu Chi. Whoever cited it was hoping no one would go through it but I did. I'm going to change it to citation needed until someone provides actual content that demonstrates attitudes towards Tzu Chi has changed. --114.25.10.148 (talk) 10:05, 12 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Took out Wade–Giles "Tz'u Chi". icetea8 (talk) 23:57, 11 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Should "Hall of Still Thoughts" be "Still Thoughts Hall"? icetea8 (talk) 00:06, 12 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Where's the information on their charity work? Where are they operating internationally? What exactly are they doing? How are they doing it? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 72.137.39.216 (talk) 20:09, 9 February 2012 (EST)

This needs more secondary sources. "a network of world-class medical facilities in Taiwan and a comprehensive education system" sounds a bit like advertising language to me. 50.98.201.158 (talk) 17:27, 22 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I believe this was written improperly as it should be more like "taking the wrong path", as the wording for "right path" they always talk about is 正道, and this should naturally be the opposite of it. Never heard them once say not to jaywalk...they just say to respect "traffic laws", but it's in the context of "don't run red lights or speed"...didn't want to make any changes, so I thought I could bring it up here to help.

Source: My boyfriend's mother is part of this charity and watches their TV channel often. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 123.194.246.153 (talk) 15:04, 5 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Extended content

If you recommend as above perhaps that the single liner on jaywalking is written improperly, quoting them in context they - with the 'they' being the original cause of confusions or even troubles and problems here - may have specifically indicated that because in Taiwan they have a said abundance of vehicles as well as scooters, and thereby their said Venerable Cheng Yen either directly or indirectly requested that Tzu Chi followers obey traffic laws as you have rightly suggested perhaps, INCLUDING non-jaywalking. In doing so, they have once or regularly added this guideline or admonishment as part of their said eight precepts. Customising the precepts is hardly a totalitarian issue, if you note perhaps how Cheng Yen was born of Formosa, so when the name of an entire island can be changed, whether the issue is about abstaining from jaywalking or following traffic laws, perhaps, the issue of localization comes into the picture. So putting things in context take as an example how your boyfriend's mother watches their TV channel being a Tzu Chi participant, honestly I myself am okay with it they have got some fantastic drama serials and sophisticated news headlines, still this is where I may bring up a few issues then: When Tzu Chi sets up their Daai TV in Youtube channel too, like I said it's perfectly alright, your boyfriend's and his mother can have their own Xiaoai and Laoai channels respectively too! The Shakyamuni Buddha was actually quite a male chauvinist, He forbade women from shaving off their hair initially, preferring them to be lay householders who listened to Him speak. Historically, He spoke of affluent Buddhist and Taiwanese are being used as part of their organizational name. Like you said, I also believe this was written improperly as it should be more like "Cheng Yen" and "Rui Zheng", So, again if it is okay for you that Ven Cheng Yen doesn't even cross roads as a pedestrian, she takes the train and this lifetime she has never taken an aeroplane yet since she lives only within Hualien, yet in Taipei and worldwide every other Tzu Chi member drives a posh car bigger than your boyfriend's, again like I said I'm quite alright with that too. Again on the context of you and your boyfriend's mother, with sincere apologies perhaps, Tzu Chi has their own informal way of addressing uniformed members via the term " Rahula shave their hair - why does Cheng Yen allow her secular sibling having hair and even kids then? They call themselves hens, they want to touch and perhaps own money and have families. I thought again that is perfectly fine, Tzu Chi people aren't any different from us ordinary folks they have sentient desires and needs too. Yet, what if the Tzu Chi people need to also have a military budget too? Quite alright, isn't it? We have legs, we walk, we have horses, we ride, we have roads, we cross, we have hands, we work, we have money, we buy, we have property, we defend, we have land, we .. we farm .. everybody loves one another, that big machine hiding behind the barn with a pointy turret gun is just an accidental invention because we built broadcasting stations, schools and hospitals , like we perhaps are, again like I said I'm quite alright with that too. So when Tzu Chi wants to go on the right path, and continue on the right path, your mother needs to become a volunteer and recruit nieces of Cheng Yen - perhaps better - then watching again the same Daai TV shows, like I said I'm quite alright with that too. Because Venerable Cheng Yen is such a heroine of our time, when she eventually passes on you get to mourn her and even have a national holiday, if Tzu Chi build monuments in memory of her or - ahem - him, all of us can bring our kids and worship shrines or Jing Si Halls with her or - ahem - him as our national or religious savior. I may even get to be buried or cremated beside her, WONDERFUL! I don't know, why did they build Wikipedia in the first place then? I won't understand, why would you bother whether is it 'jaywalking', or respecting "traffic laws" or "don't run red lights or speed" when Taiwanese Buddhist laws are primarily in Singaporean, if they i.e. all Tzu Chi key stakeholders perceive, intend, read, write, type, speak, work, act, mind, strive and concentrate in English then maybe we have a real problem, why are they printing and publishing their teachings in Traditional Chinese? The historical Buddha spoke only Pali and Sanskrit! Are you going to load yourself, your boyfriend and his mother with a paratrooper group of Taiwanese Buddhist Tzu Chi participants and air-drop them in land-gulfed Himalaya region can be proved to be female instead of male...... Enlightenment can perhaps only spread as far as stupidity may, 林榮祥 05:56, 3 April 2015 (UTC) Preceding unsigned comment added by User:Ronggy (talk) 05:56, 3 April 2015 (UTC)[reply] ^What the heck is this? Wikiman5676 (talk) 17:53, 3 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Controversies

Edited this section to better reflect the quoted sources, plus added some missing sources. — Preceding unsigned comment added by T94jal (talk • contribs) 14:58, 3 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Who put the "article needs to be updated" tag? And what info are you referring too that needs updating? Wikiman5676 (talk) 23:23, 15 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

since nobody has said anything i have removed the "needs to be updated" tag. I updated numerous points of information in my previous edits and since nobody can indicate what needs updating I have removed the tag.Wikiman5676 (talk) 03:10, 11 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Do we really need the title of the org to be translated into that many languages? Wikiman5676 (talk) 02:28, 4 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on Tzu Chi. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20120227183910/http://info.taiwan.net.tw/tourbusE/december_page1.html to http://info.taiwan.net.tw/tourbusE/december_page1.html
• Added archive https://archive.is/20121228094810/https://www.nyredcross.org/?nd=news_room_detail&news_id=53&jid=63915 to https://www.nyredcross.org/?nd=news_room_detail&news_id=53&jid=63915
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20090404090834/http://www.tzuchi.org/GLOBAL/offices/index.html to http://www.tzuchi.org/global/offices/index.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018.

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 08:34, 10 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Having read the article, Wikiman5676, I think it is almost at B. One thing that is noticeable—and you are not going to like it—is that there is no criticism mentioned in the article. Considering the large scope and impact of the organization, I find it unlikely that the organization has no critics. If you want to upgrade the article to GA or FA, you might also want to find information on how the organization responds to certain issues in national debate, and positions itself politically. Having seen a documentary about Tuzu Chi from a a Buddhist television station in Holland, I noticed the doctors working in their hospitals are very much aware of beliefs and practices among the Taiwanese, and oppose some of those. Apart from these issues, the article is well-organized and well-written, and with some adjustments for neutrality could make it to GA or FA.--Farang Rak Tham (talk) 12:22, 3 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

yes I do remember there being a section on criticism before. But it was removed by some random editor like a year ago. That section was certainly a violation of

WP:CRITICISM anyways however, as it took up close to half the article and just listed complaints. But yes you are right. Tzu Chi, like other major Buddhists orgs like Wat Phra Dhammakaya and Fo Guang Shan, is the source of significant criticism, especially in its home country of Taiwan. I will see if i can find that old section on criticism and incorporate some of the information in a way that fits with wikipedia policy. Wikiman5676 (talk) 18:47, 3 February 2018 (UTC)[reply

]

Okay so i found the old controversy section in an archived edit and put it in my sandbox. however many of the links are now dead making verification difficult. I will still try to mention some of the controversies this is going to take longer than i previously thought. Wikiman5676 (talk) 20:02, 3 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

WP:WTW.--Farang Rak Tham (talk) 10:31, 4 February 2018 (UTC)[reply

]

You know Farang Rak Tham, i finally got to doing this. The amount of blantant media speculation and tabloid mania present in these sources is just ridiculous. And I thought Thailand had poor media quality. Even though Taiwan is a developed country its not much better. Anyways, ive started incorporating some of the critical stuff, using strictly the facts presented in the sources. Ill try to look for more, but i think the article needs some restructure to incorporate it all. Wikiman5676 (talk) 07:02, 31 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Good, Wikiman5676. Sometimes English-language sources are of lower quality than the local-language sources. Don't forget to indicate how the temple responded to criticism, as people sometimes express the best who they are once they are under attack.--Farang Rak Tham (Talk) 13:17, 31 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Here's the Dutch documentary about the temple i mentioned before. For what it's worth. Most of the interviews are in English.--Farang Rak Tham (Talk) 13:33, 31 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

It has come to my attention that there are conflicting dates for the organization's founding. [1] [2]. Therefore I have changed the founding date to year only. Wikiman5676 (talk) 06:12, 1 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]