Talk:Underline

This redirect does not require a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Typography Low‑importance This redirect is within the scope of WikiProject Typography, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of articles related to Typography on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.TypographyWikipedia:WikiProject TypographyTemplate:WikiProject TypographyTypography articles Low This redirect has been rated as Low-importance on the importance scale. Writing systems Low‑importance This redirect falls within the scope of WikiProject Writing systems, a WikiProject interested in improving the encyclopaedic coverage and content of articles relating to writing systems on Wikipedia. If you would like to help out, you are welcome to drop by the project page and/or leave a query at the project’s talk page.Writing systemsWikipedia:WikiProject Writing systemsTemplate:WikiProject Writing systemsWriting system articles Low This redirect has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

This redirect is written in American English, which has its own spelling conventions (color, defense, traveled) and some terms that are used in it may be different or absent from other varieties of English. According to the relevant style guide, this should not be changed without broad consensus.

How is underlined text with descenders typographically handled best?--Hhielscher 15:55, 20 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Why doesn't underline itself ("_") redirect here? Due to technical restrictions? --88.114.175.12 (talk) 14:41, 5 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Technical a restriction I think, though otherwise it probably should redirect to Underscore instead. Space and underscore characters are treated equivalent, and they are stripped from the beginning and end of page names. See WP:Page name#Invalid page names. This “_” URL says “Bad title”, and this [[_]] wiki link is ignored. Vadmium (talk) 03:45, 6 April 2011 (UTC).[reply]

what about edition.cnn.com/video/flashLive/live.html?stream=1 201.225.188.14 (talk) 02:49, 20 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Double underline (equivalent to bold underline) has a specific meaning in accounting, but I can't find a good source for this or a list of rules. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Fulldecent (talk • contribs) 14:52, 20 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

How is Unicode text differentiated from "plain text" here. Maybe it should be noted that "plain text" which is encoded in ASCII does not support underlining 5.10.169.18 (talk) 08:32, 6 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

In the [Combining_diacritic

In large blocks of text you would normally have to read a sentence to know what its talking about. If you underline you need only read the underlined material which highlights the subject of the paragraph. This lets you get though large amounts of material quickly. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Charlieb000 (talk • contribs) 21:53, 1 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Adding a bit on this. Basically, for historical reasons (printing has used italics for this for centuries) printing and book people think of underlining as a big no-no in printed text and that idea has carried over to computers (maybe because it stands out a bit too much). See this manual of legal writing which calls it 'a look mostly as­so­ci­ated with su­per­mar­ket tabloids'...) Wikipedia's own manual of style goes so far as to say text should never be underlined at all! Blythwood (talk) 01:37, 5 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I am marking this article as using American English because the original version ] used American English and there is no consensus expressed on this talk page to make a change. Jc3s5h (talk) 13:58, 13 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Until now, we have two articles, Underscore and Underline, that are essentially the same because the words are synonyms. I have taken the advice at