Talk:United Press International Athlete of the Year Award

Awards Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Awards, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of awards and prizes on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.AwardsWikipedia:WikiProject AwardsTemplate:WikiProject Awardsawards articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the importance scale.

Sports

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Sports, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of sport-related topics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SportsWikipedia:WikiProject SportsTemplate:WikiProject Sportssports articles

To-do list:

Here are some tasks awaiting attention:

Sport governing body (this should-be-major article is in a shameful state)
* Field hockey (History section needs sources and accurate information - very vague at the moment.)
* Standardize Category:American college sports infobox templates to use same font size and spacing.
* Sport in the United Kingdom - the Popularity
section is incorrect and unsourced. Reliable data is required.
* Fix project template and/or "to do list" Current version causes tables of content to be hidden unless/until reader chooses "show."
Expand : Professional sports (crucial article explaining the salaried undertaking of sports)
* Sport industry (currently a sub-stub)
Photo : for pages listed in Category:Wikipedia requested images of sports and games and sub-categories.
Stubs : work on articles in Category:Sports stubs
Update : List of world sports championships
Other :

Translate
the page of sport in each country from corresponding article in other language Wikipedia to English Wikipedia which was marked in red.

olympic
) sports to be part of this project

RfCs: answer requests for comment

lead

Because I understand the first footnote to be relative specifically to the panel phrase, to-wit, to serve to qualify the constitution of the panel (as against, e.g., to serve to provide a source for or explanation of the entire sentence), I returned the footnote to a position anterior to the

WP:FN to be incorrect (to be sure, neither usage here appears to be disfavored by FN, but I think it better that the footnote precede the full stop in order that such footnote should not seem to refer to the totality of the sentence [the principle source for which is provided infra in the references]), he/she should, of course, feel free to rv. Joe 06:44, 11 February 2007 (UTC)[reply

]

No award after 1995...

...why? Sardanaphalus 22:07, 10 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I was wondering this as well.--88.227.205.14 (talk) 09:47, 16 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]