Talk:Up! Close and Personal/GA1
GA Review
GA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch
Reviewer: Toa Nidhiki05 (talk · contribs · count) 00:54, 30 September 2011 (UTC)
- herefor what they are not)
- It is reasonably well written.
- a (prose): b (lists):
- a (prose): b (
- It is factually accurate and verifiable.
- a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):
- a (references): b (citations to
- It is broad in its coverage.
- a (major aspects): b (focused):
- a (major aspects): b (focused):
- It follows the neutral point of viewpolicy.
- Fair representation without bias:
- Fair representation without bias:
- It is stable.
- No edit wars, etc.:
- No edit wars, etc.:
- It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
- a (images are tagged and non-free images have suitable captions):
- a (images are tagged and non-free images have
- Overall:
- Pass/Fail:
- Pass/Fail:
Concerns/Notes
- The source used for the line "Krauss later expressed her opposing views, saying she would have personally kept the original lyrics, although she respected Twain's decision." is correct aside from the last bit - nowhere in the source does she say she respected the decision.
- Done.
- I would suggest also including an image from the DVD, to add a more visual appeal to the article. This is not a concern, and will not factor into my decision.
- I don't think it's needed. The cover already has her outfit from all of the concert. I added an image of Alison Krauss though. -- ipodnano05 * leave@message 17:19, 2 October 2011 (UTC)
Other than that, the article fits criteria. If you can fix this one issue, I'd be willing to pass this article. :) Toa Nidhiki05 00:54, 30 September 2011 (UTC)