Talk:Up! Close and Personal

Page contents not supported in other languages.
Source: Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.
Good articleUp! Close and Personal has been listed as one of the Music good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.
Article milestones
DateProcessResult
October 2, 2011Good article nomineeListed

Fair use rationale for Image:Ucp.jpg

fair use
.

Please go to

Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline
is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 04:20, 5 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:Ucp.jpg

fair use
.

Please go to

Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline
is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

talk) 02:15, 12 February 2008 (UTC)[reply
]

GA Review

This review is . The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: Toa Nidhiki05 (talk · contribs · count) 00:54, 30 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

here
for what they are not)
  1. It is reasonably well written.
    a (prose): b (
    lists
    )
    :
  2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.
    a (references): b (citations to
    reliable sources): c (OR
    ):
  3. It is broad in its coverage.
    a (major aspects): b (focused):
  4. It follows the
    neutral point of view
    policy
    .
    Fair representation without bias:
  5. It is stable.
    No edit wars, etc.:
  6. It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
    a (images are tagged and non-free images have
    suitable captions
    )
    :
  7. Overall:
    Pass/Fail:

Concerns/Notes

  • The source used for the line "Krauss later expressed her opposing views, saying she would have personally kept the original lyrics, although she respected Twain's decision." is correct aside from the last bit - nowhere in the source does she say she respected the decision.
  • Done.
  • I would suggest also including an image from the DVD, to add a more visual appeal to the article. This is not a concern, and will not factor into my decision.
  • I don't think it's needed. The cover already has her outfit from all of the concert. I added an image of Alison Krauss though. -- ipodnano05 * leave@message 17:19, 2 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Other than that, the article fits criteria. If you can fix this one issue, I'd be willing to pass this article. :) Toa Nidhiki05 00:54, 30 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Alright, great job with the changes. Passed. :) Toa Nidhiki05 18:38, 2 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]