Talk:Vatican City at the 2022 Mediterranean Games
 | Vatican City at the 2022 Mediterranean Games has been listed as one of the Sports and recreation good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it. Review: April 8, 2024. (Reviewed version). |
 | Vatican City at the 2022 Mediterranean Games was nominated as a Sports and recreation good article, but it did not meet the good article criteria at the time (June 12, 2023, reviewed version). There are suggestions on the review page for improving the article. If you can improve it, please do; it may then be renominated. |
 | This article is rated GA-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
.svg)
.jpg){kind=small}
 | This article was created or improved during WikiProject Europe's "European 10,000 Challenge", which started on November 1, 2016, and is ongoing. You can help out! |
GA Review
The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
| GA toolbox |
|---|
| Reviewing |
- This review is transcluded from Talk:Vatican City at the 2022 Mediterranean Games/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.
Reviewer: Actualcpscm (talk · contribs) 09:45, 12 June 2023 (UTC)
Quick fail: This article is a long way from meeting criterion 1, as it requires extensive copyediting for grammar and clarity in its current state. I have added a relevant maintenance template to the article.
Some additional considerations: Citations should be expanded to include all available information, not just URLs and titles. The article appears very short. I understand that there might not be that much to say about this, but I don't think this can be considered broad in its coverage.
GA Review
The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
| GA toolbox |
|---|
| Reviewing |
- This review is transcluded from Talk:Vatican City at the 2022 Mediterranean Games/GA2. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.
Nominator: Arconning (talk · contribs) 07:01, 17 March 2024 (UTC)
Reviewer: Chaotic Enby (talk · contribs) 14:24, 31 March 2024 (UTC)
Going to start the review! Looks much better than it was during the first review, grammar and prose are cleaner already and the article is slightly more thorough.
- Sorry for the delay, finally getting to do the review after a few days of procrastinating it. My apologies! Chaotıċ Enby (talk · contribs) 21:44, 8 April 2024 (UTC)
- GA review (see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)
- It is reasonably well written.
- a (prose, spelling, and grammar):
b (lists):
- Prose is clear and understandable. The lead is a good summary of the non-background part of the article, although a few words could be added about the background context (just adding
After previously participating as observers in the 2019 Games of the Small States of Europe and as guests in the 2022 Championships of the Small States of Europe, ...
should do it). Sections are good, but the invitation/delegation paragraph doesn't really fit in the "background" section. Article is factual, with no issues regarding words to watch (the "unofficial and symbolic" part is well-explained), and the sports result work with the "embedded list" format.
- Prose is clear and understandable. The lead is a good summary of the non-background part of the article, although a few words could be added about the background context (just adding
- a (prose, spelling, and grammar):
- It is factually accurate and source spot-check.
- a ():
- All sources seem to be reliable, with secondary sourcing used whenever possible. No signs of OR, and Earwig's only hit (the infobae.com source) comes from the incorporated quote and names like
2019 Games of the Small States of Europe
.
- All sources seem to be reliable, with secondary sourcing used whenever possible. No signs of OR, and Earwig's only hit (the infobae.com source) comes from the incorporated quote and names like
- a ():
- It is broad in its coverage.
- a (major aspects): b (focused):
- With only one athlete, the topic isn't a very wide one to cover, but the key facts are still here. The background context is helpful without being overbearing.
- a (major aspects):
- It follows the neutral point of view policy.
- Fair representation without bias:
- No real dispute to speak of. Maybe you could mention (in the Background section) that Carnicelli's earlier third place result was also unofficial?
- Fair representation without bias:
- It is stable.
- No edit wars, etc.:
- No edit wars, etc.:
- It is illustrated by images and other media, where possible and appropriate.
- a (images are tagged and non-free content have non-free use rationales):
b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
- The two images (country flag and stadium picture) are properly used, with the latter having a descriptive caption. Not sure about whether the license of the stadium picture is accurate (claimed as CC BY-SA 4.0 "own work" by the uploader, but appears to be a drone picture), although I don't think that's an issue for the GA nomination.
- a (images are tagged and non-free content have non-free use rationales):
- Overall:
- Pass/Fail:
- Barring some minor style details that can be easily fixed, the article is good to go!
- Pass/Fail:
Here's the review done, I'm going to fix the small details and mark the article as passed! Chaotıċ Enby (talk · contribs) 22:18, 8 April 2024 (UTC)