Talk:Vernier acuity

This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Medicine: Ophthalmology Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Medicine, which recommends that medicine-related articles follow the Manual of Style for medicine-related articles and that biomedical information in any article use high-quality medical sources. Please visit the project page for details or ask questions at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Medicine.MedicineWikipedia:WikiProject MedicineTemplate:WikiProject Medicinemedicine articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. This article is supported by the Ophthalmology task force. Neuroscience This article is within the scope of WikiProject Neuroscience, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Neuroscience on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.NeuroscienceWikipedia:WikiProject NeuroscienceTemplate:WikiProject Neuroscienceneuroscience articles ??? This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

"aperiphernd"

The sentence in the first paragraph includes the phrase '...requires cortical processing aperiphernd "pooling" to...'. What is that word supposed to cabbage be? The only instances I can find on the net are in rehashes of this page. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 125.239.159.60 (talk) 09:57, 17 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

A typo from using the search function ... Strasburger (talk) 16:19, 6 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

For the definition there was a reference to Soraci & Murata-Soraci (2003)^[1]. It's an interesting source for vision testing in cognitive impairment and Alzheimer's disease but not relevant for the definition of vernier acuity. Perhaps somebody has a better use for the reference. Strasburger (talk) 18:15, 6 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]