Talk:Virtual actor

This article was nominated for deletion on 4 Jan 2007. The result of the discussion was keep.

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Industrial design, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Industrial design on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Industrial designWikipedia:WikiProject Industrial designTemplate:WikiProject Industrial designIndustrial design articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Animation Low‑importance

	Animation portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Animation, a collaborative effort to build an encyclopedic guide to animation on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, help out with the open tasks, or contribute to the discussion.AnimationWikipedia:WikiProject AnimationTemplate:WikiProject AnimationAnimation articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Ref

this ref: "Siggraph 2005 Digital Face Cloning Course Notes" is currently a link to a google cache page. It will probably disapear pretty soon, as the original content is already gone. While the text is still here, it would be good if we can use the still accesable text to find other refs that will (hopefully) be more persistent. Martijn Hoekstra (talk) 12:38, 17 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Is there an

boy00 @236, i.e. 04:40, 28 December 2007 (UTC)[reply

]

Requested move

The following discussion is an archived discussion of the . Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result was move. Vassyana (talk) 08:20, 17 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Clearly what the article describes are virtual actors, all of the examples given in this section have little resemblance to a human and could never be confused with a real human. The term "virtual human" simply doesn't hold up. --ASU (talk) 20:34, 7 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Support in current context. "Virtual actor" is an existing referenced term (see news, books, scholar). Cross porpoises (talk) 19:06, 15 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the proposal. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.