Talk:WPBF

WPBF has been listed as one of the Media and drama good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.
Review: November 8, 2023. (Reviewed version).

A fact from WPBF appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 1 December 2023 (check views). The text of the entry was as follows:

Did you know... that a Florida TV station was late to its first broadcast because an engineer overslept?

A record of the entry may be seen at Wikipedia:Recent additions/2023/December. The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/WPBF.

Wikipedia

Miami Mid‑importance

	This article is part of WikiProject Miami, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to the Miami metropolitan area on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks.MiamiWikipedia:WikiProject MiamiTemplate:WikiProject MiamiMiami articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Media Low‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Media, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Media on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.MediaWikipedia:WikiProject MediaTemplate:WikiProject MediaMedia articles

Low

This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

WikiProject Media To-do List:

Here are some tasks awaiting attention:

Content (media and publishing)
Verify : Multimedia, Alternative media, Alternative newspaper

Other :

Answer requests for comments

Television: Stations Low‑importance

	Television portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Television, a collaborative effort to develop and improve Wikipedia articles about television programs. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page where you can join the discussion. To improve this article, please refer to the style guidelines for the type of work.TelevisionWikipedia:WikiProject TelevisionTemplate:WikiProject Televisiontelevision articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by the Television stations task force (assessed as Mid-importance).

Florida Low‑importance

	Florida portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Florida. If you would like to join us, please visit the project page; if you have any questions, please consult the FAQ.FloridaWikipedia:WikiProject FloridaTemplate:WikiProject FloridaFlorida articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Fair use criteria

The use of images not in compliance with our

nonfree content is not appropriate, and the images have been removed. Please do not restore them. — Moe ε 19:59, 30 June 2007 (UTC)[reply

]

GA Review

Passed. Generalissima (talk) 21:27, 8 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

This review is
transcluded from Talk:WPBF/GA1
. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: Generalissima (talk · contribs) 04:21, 7 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Good day! I intend to review this article. Thank you for your continued good work with these articles. --Generalissima (talk) 04:21, 7 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Images

Two images in article. 'WPBF_2021.svg' and 'FEMA - 38682 - FEMA PIO with Television media.jpg' are both in public domain and useful for the purposes of the article. All is good on this front.

Lede

Pretty decent lede. I would suggest adding the hasty construction and beginning of operations to the lede - a warehouse being turned into an operational news studio in two months would pique the interest of readers skimming the lede.

Beefed up the lead section to have a bit more detail. Good idea.

History

Thank you very much for using clippings for the Newspapers.com-sourced citations.

All the sources I checked were accurately summarized. The prose is of particularly good quality and engaging - I can't say I have ever read about the negotiations behind the operations of a television station in my life, but it is presented in a way that made me want to keep reading. The context of how unusual reverse compensation was seen at this time and how rushed the initial setup of the station was gave useful context, and I'm sure will to readers as well.

I wish there would be more information in the Paxson and Hearst section on its history under Hearst ownership, but I understand if there is a relative paucity of sources on that matter compared to Paxson's tenure.

I do too, but by this time a TV station article becomes really the news department and little else.

News operation

No real complaints with this section. The sentence "Founding news director Lee Polowczuk started on November 14, and within 50 days and after receiving hundreds of unsolicited audition tapes from around the country." is phrased a bit awkwardly, and might be best to split into two separate sentences. Other than that, nothing really springs to mind.

Split a little more cleanly and reorganized this paragraph a little.

Technical information

Sure is technical information. The Analog-to-digital conversion part was interesting. I see no problems here.

Citations, external links, etc.

All seems in good order here. Linking to the station's website makes sense as an external link.

General thoughts

I think you just need to clear up the mentioned slightly messy sentence and add a little bit of context to the lede and things will be good to go for GA requirements. Thanks for the article! Generalissima (talk) 19:17, 8 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@Generalissima: Done. Sammi Brie (she/her • t • c) 21:12, 8 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you for your changes.

Rate	Attribute	Review Comment
1. Well-written:
	1a. the prose is clear, concise, and understandable to an appropriately broad audience; spelling and grammar are correct.
	1b. it complies with the list incorporation .
2. Verifiable with no original research:
	2a. it contains a list of all references (sources of information), presented in accordance with the layout style guideline .
	2b. reliable sources are cited inline. All content that could reasonably be challenged, except for plot summaries and that which summarizes cited content elsewhere in the article, must be cited no later than the end of the paragraph (or line if the content is not in prose).
	2c. it contains no original research.
	2d. it contains no copyright violations or plagiarism.
3. Broad in its coverage:
	3a. it addresses the main aspects of the topic.
	3b. it stays focused on the topic without going into unnecessary detail (see summary style).
	4. Neutral: it represents viewpoints fairly and without editorial bias, giving due weight to each.
	5. Stable: it does not change significantly from day to day because of an ongoing edit war or content dispute.
6. Illustrated, if possible, by media such as audio :
	6a. media are tagged with their copyright statuses, and valid non-free use rationales are provided for non-free content.
	6b. media are relevant to the topic, and have suitable captions .
	7. Overall assessment.	Good job! >:3

Generalissima (talk) 21:26, 8 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Did you know nomination

The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by 97198 talk 13:16, 25 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

(

Comment or view
Article history

)

... that a Florida TV station was late to its first broadcast because an engineer overslept? Source: https://www.newspapers.com/clip/35255769/fanfare-absent-as-switchovers-strike/
- Reviewed: Template:Did you know nominations/Wappenmünzen

Improved to Good Article status by Sammi Brie (talk). Self-nominated at 05:57, 9 November 2023 (UTC). Post-promotion hook changes for this nom will be logged at Template talk:Did you know nominations/WPBF; consider watching this nomination, if it is successful, until the hook appears on the Main Page.[reply]

connect 23:50, 9 November 2023 (UTC)[reply
]