Talk:West Creek (Pennsylvania)

West Creek (Pennsylvania) has been listed as one of the Geography and places good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it. Review: March 6, 2015. (Reviewed version).

A fact from West Creek (Pennsylvania) appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 9 May 2014 (check views). The text of the entry was as follows: Did you know... that there are nearly 900 macroinvertebrates per square meter in the lower reaches of West Creek? A record of the entry may be seen at Wikipedia:Recent additions/2014/May. The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/West Creek (Pennsylvania).

This article is rated GA-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Pennsylvania Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Pennsylvania, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Pennsylvania on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PennsylvaniaWikipedia:WikiProject PennsylvaniaTemplate:WikiProject PennsylvaniaPennsylvania articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. Rivers Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Rivers, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Rivers on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.RiversWikipedia:WikiProject RiversTemplate:WikiProject RiversRiver articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

This review is

transcluded from Talk:West Creek (Pennsylvania)/GA1

. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: Cwmhiraeth (talk · contribs) 07:02, 5 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

• I propose to take on this review and will make a first reading shortly. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 07:02, 5 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

First reading

• There are too many short or even single sentence paragraphs.

• The majority have been fixed. --
  talk) 14:31, 5 March 2015 (UTC)[reply
  ]

• Better now? --
  talk) 14:31, 5 March 2015 (UTC)[reply
  ]

• Done. --
  talk) 14:31, 5 March 2015 (UTC)[reply
  ]

• High enough levels can cause fish kills. I've explained this. --
  talk) 14:31, 5 March 2015 (UTC)[reply
  ]

• Wow, my old prose is really choppy. I've merged several of the sentences. --
  talk) 14:31, 5 March 2015 (UTC)[reply
  ]

• The bridge was sold. Should be evident to the reader since the previous sentence is about the bridge being moved to another location. --
  talk) 14:31, 5 March 2015 (UTC)[reply
  ]

• Done. --
  talk) 14:31, 5 March 2015 (UTC)[reply
  ]

• I've given a rough explanation of both. --
  talk) 14:31, 5 March 2015 (UTC)[reply
  ]

• The length such a basic fact that I think it's fine in the lead and doesn't need to be repeated. --
  talk) 14:31, 5 March 2015 (UTC)[reply
  ]

• That's already done by means of a wikilink. --
  talk) 14:31, 5 March 2015 (UTC)[reply
  ]

• That's all for now. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 07:35, 5 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

• I am satisfied with the alterations made. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 10:50, 6 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

GA criteria

• The article is well written and complies with MOS guidelines on prose, grammar, structure and layout.
• The article uses several reliable third-party sources, and makes frequent citations to them. I do not believe it contains original research.
• The article covers the main aspects of the subject and remains focussed.
• The article is neutral.
• The article is stable, having been created by the nominator in May 2014 and having been edited by few other editors.
• The single images is relevant and has a suitable caption. It was created by the nominator and is properly licensed.

• Final assessment - I believe this article reaches the GA criteria. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 10:50, 6 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]