Talk:Yugoslav Braille

This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Writing systems Mid‑importance This article falls within the scope of WikiProject Writing systems, a WikiProject interested in improving the encyclopaedic coverage and content of articles relating to writing systems on Wikipedia. If you would like to help out, you are welcome to drop by the project page and/or leave a query at the project’s talk page.Writing systemsWikipedia:WikiProject Writing systemsTemplate:WikiProject Writing systemsWriting system articles Mid This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale. Disability Yugoslav Braille is within the scope of WikiProject Disability. For more information, visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.DisabilityWikipedia:WikiProject DisabilityTemplate:WikiProject DisabilityDisability articles

Commented out the chart until it can be verified. Unesco is almost always wrong. Croatian is contradicted here, though that may be a computer-braille adaptation. — kwami (talk) 21:09, 13 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

You comment that World Braille Usage is almost always wrong. I am trying to document the errors. I have found errors in Maltese and Vietnamese. But not much else. Can you enlighten me about additional errors? Silver dot (talk) 11:44, 8 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Kwamikagami, I am of the impression that it’s better to render text as text than as images, especially when the required Unicode characters are so widely supported. Among other things, text Braille does not get inconsistent scaling on mobile just because it’s a set of images.

The template {{Braille cell}} defaults to text for a good reason. Artoria2e5 🌉 07:03, 8 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@Artoria2e5: I don't disagree, but by consensus all of our many other braille articles use images, so IMO if we're going to change this, we should change them across the board. Also, as you had edited it, the braille characters overflowed the cells of the table and overlay other cells, so that those weren't legible. Perhaps that's a defect in the bc template, if the cells of a table don't resize to fit large font sizes? We should probably have a general discussion, perhaps at the main braille article, and then use a bot or AWB to consistently format all of our articles per the new consensus (if there's consensus to change). — kwami (talk) 08:18, 8 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]