Template:Did you know nominations/Albert Sidney Johnston (Ney)
<
Template:Did you know nominations
- The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: promoted by Cwmhiraeth (talk) 06:49, 2 November 2017 (UTC)
| DYK toolbox |
|---|
Albert Sidney Johnston (Ney)
... thatISBN 9780292760363.)- ALT1:
... that, when designingAlbert Sidney Johnston's grave memorial, Elisabet Ney refused to include elements that could not plausibly have been present at the Battle of Shiloh? Source: "Without a touch of sarcasm, Ney commented that she was trying to make her sculpture as realistic as possible and that she found it very unlikely that one of Johnston's lieutenants would have placed a Constitution in his hand at the moment of his death on the Shiloh battlefield." (Martinello, Marian L.; Cutrer, Emily; Lowman, Al (1983). Elisabet Ney: Artist, Woman, Texan. University of Texas Institute of Texan Cultures at San Antonio. p. 29.)
- Reviewed: Myron Prinzmetal
Created by Bryanrutherford0 (talk). Self-nominated at 01:30, 7 October 2017 (UTC).
The article is new, long enough, well referenced, neutral, and I couldn't see any close paraphrasing. I think the hook is brilliant (and would work very nicely in the "quirky" spot of the set) and it is supported by inline citations. QPQ is done. 97198 (talk) 05:08, 10 October 2017 (UTC)
- Albert Sidney Johnston (Ney) to the Albert Sidney Johnston article to bring it up to speed? Thanks, Yoninah (talk) 18:28, 10 October 2017 (UTC)
- Oh, I didn't think to check that! I've added a couple of my sources to support the claims about his grave monument in his biographical article, but I don't have the books that most of the citations seem to be drawn from in that article, so it would be tough for me to try to fill in the (many) missing citations. Hrm... If that article isn't sufficiently well supported to be linked from the front page, could we un-link his name in the hook? That makes the joke a little tougher to parse, though; I can try to come up with a different hook if this policy kills my first proposal.-Bryanrutherford0 (talk) 19:12, 10 October 2017 (UTC)
- @Bryanrutherford0: I think you should come up with a different hook. Most of the uncited paragraphs in the biography article have to do with army history, which would take an expert (or someone with a bunch of books) to fill in. Not linking it, when it has a Wikipedia page, wouldn't make sense. Sorry. Yoninah (talk) 00:39, 1 November 2017 (UTC)
- So, in effect, the hook can't mention the piece's subject? Hrm... How about the above proposal?-Bryanrutherford0 (talk) 03:39, 1 November 2017 (UTC)
- @Bryanrutherford0: ALT1 sounds more factual than hooky. What do you think about:
- ALT2: ... that ) 20:51, 1 November 2017 (UTC)
- Sounds good to me! Maybe another preposition in place of "over," like "atop" or "above" might emphasize the joke a little more? I like it!-Bryanrutherford0 (talk) 00:15, 2 November 2017 (UTC)
