Template:Did you know nominations/Bernard Pitt
<
Template:Did you know nominations
- The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: promoted by Theleekycauldron (talk) 05:51, 17 November 2022 (UTC)
| DYK toolbox |
|---|
Bernard Pitt
Bernard Pitt
- ... that a study of Anglo-Saxon literature begun by ISBN 978-1-107-65871-4.
- ALT1: ... that the widow of ISBN 978-1-317-17569-8.
- Reviewed: Template:Did you know nominations/Phenomenal Cat
- Comment: Potentially a good one to run on Remebrance Day (11 November) or Remembrance Sunday (13 November)
- ALT1: ... that the widow of
Moved to mainspace by Dumelow (talk). Self-nominated at 12:20, 28 October 2022 (UTC).
Article is new enough (created 10/28), long enough, and well sourced. Earwig shows 24.2% similarity with the Brunel piece, but that's mostly because of a long quote that is properly attributed. I can't access the source for alt0 but the quote provided supports the hook, and GF is assumed. Both hooks are interesting, short enough, and in-line cited. QPQ completed. Cbl62 (talk) 17:50, 28 October 2022 (UTC)
- @Dumelow:
for ALT0, was it completed by the colleague, or just collected and published? And who is the colleague? theleekycauldron (talk • contribs) (she/her) 10:29, 13 November 2022 (UTC)
- Hi theleekycauldron. I named him in the article (Alfred J. Wyatt), he may well be notable (though as far as I can tell this is his only publication) but doesn't have an article so didn't mention him in the hook. You can find the full text of the book's dedication here at Archive.org. Pitt worked on it with Wyatt in 1914-15 but doesn't seem to have got much past a literature review. The work was then completed by Wyatt, who is credited as the sole author - Dumelow (talk) 06:37, 14 November 2022 (UTC)
- @Dumelow: if that's the case, I'm not quite seeing that reflected in the article – could you add that information? theleekycauldron (talk • contribs) (she/her) 09:38, 15 November 2022 (UTC)
- Hi theleekycauldron. I named him in the article (Alfred J. Wyatt), he may well be notable (though as far as I can tell this is his only publication) but doesn't have an article so didn't mention him in the hook. You can find the full text of the book's dedication here at Archive.org. Pitt worked on it with Wyatt in 1914-15 but doesn't seem to have got much past a literature review. The work was then completed by Wyatt, who is credited as the sole author - Dumelow (talk) 06:37, 14 November 2022 (UTC)
- @Dumelow:
- Hi theleekycauldron, certainly but I can't work out which bit is missing, could you give me a pointer? I currently have:
- "In the Winter of 1914/15 Pitt worked with Alfred J. Wyatt on a review of Anglo-Saxon literature. Before the conclusion of the work Pitt decided to join the British Army, noting at the time that "all is naught compared with the war". The Anglo-Saxon study was completed by Wyatt and published as An Anglo-Saxon Reader in 1919.[5]"
- In the last paragraph of "Early life and career" - Dumelow (talk) 10:00, 15 November 2022 (UTC)
- Ah! I confused his literature review with his poetry. Such is the hazard of doing prep work so late at night.
my apologies :) theleekycauldron (talk • contribs) (she/her) 10:02, 15 November 2022 (UTC)
- Ah! I confused his literature review with his poetry. Such is the hazard of doing prep work so late at night.
- Hi theleekycauldron, certainly but I can't work out which bit is missing, could you give me a pointer? I currently have:
