Template:Did you know nominations/Chengjia

The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by

Wu Zhu coin issued by Chengjia

• ... that Gongsun Shu proclaimed himself emperor of Chengjia and issued his own coins (example pictured), in defiance of the Han dynasty? Source: de Crespigny and others

• Reviewed: Robert Ridder and Kathleen Ridder (two of three QPQs)

Created/expanded by Zanhe (talk) and Donald Trung (talk). Nominated by Zanhe (talk) at 23:33, 25 October 2018 (UTC).

• Hi Zanhe, review follows:

• Gongsun Shu: article more than 5x expanded between 18 and 26 October; article exceeds minimum length; article is well written and cited inline throughout to reliable sources; no copyright violation noticed, though I couldn't access all of the pages of the sources used (and one source is in Chinese) - I am happy to AGF these;
• Chengjia: article created 25 October; article exceeds minimum length; article is well written and cited inline throughout to reliable sources; no copyright violation noticed, though I couldn't access all of the pages of the sources used (and some of the sources are in Chinese) - I am happy to AGF these;

Other: I am presuming that the citation Crespigny at the end of the second paragraph of "Founding" in the Chengjia article provides the citation for the first part of the hook, but I cannot access the relevant page (269?) to check - happy to AGF; the fact is also mentioned in the Gongsun Shu article which provides additional sources. I cannot access page 254 of Twitchett et al but presume this would corroborate Crespigny and the opther source is in Chinese. The coinage fact is cited to the pages of Crespigny that I cannot access, again happy to AGF. The hook is interesting enough, image used is licensed appropriately and correctly; 2x QPQs needed but otherwise I think this one is good to go - Dumelow (talk) 07:49, 26 October 2018 (UTC)

@Dumelow: Thanks for your review. I've added two QPQs above. I've also expanded the articles further and added more ref tags for the hook fact. It's interesting how Google books decides who can read which pages, because I can read the pages without a problem. -Zanhe (talk) 04:13, 28 October 2018 (UTC)

Hi Zanhe, thanks for your rpely. I am happy to tick this now - Dumelow (talk) 14:35, 29 October 2018 (UTC)