Template:Did you know nominations/Dennis Howard Green

Source: Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.
<
Template:Did you know nominations
The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by SL93 (talk) 02:02, 17 March 2021 (UTC)

Dennis Howard Green

  • ... that Dennis Howard Green wrote all the twenty book reviews for the Modern Language Review in 1975? Source: Palmer, Nigel (9 May 2009). "Memorial for Dennis Howard Green". Trinity College Cambridge Annual Record. Trinity College, Cambridge: 123. Retrieved 3 October 2020. Dennis may not himself have engaged with these issues, but he was extremely well read, and worked his way through all the latest developments. In the year 1975 he published all of twenty book reviews in Modern Language Review. This gave rise to what is called the Lex Green, according to which the editors of Modern Language Review permit a maximum of three reviews by any one person in a year.
    • ALT1:... that Dennis Howard Green was such a productive book reviewer for the Modern Language Review that they implemented a rule called Lex Green, which limits the amount of reviews per person to three per year? Source: Palmer, Nigel (9 May 2009). "Memorial for Dennis Howard Green". Trinity College Cambridge Annual Record. Trinity College, Cambridge: 123. Retrieved 3 October 2020. Dennis may not himself have engaged with these issues, but he was extremely well read, and worked his way through all the latest developments. In the year 1975 he published all of twenty book reviews in Modern Language Review. This gave rise to what is called the Lex Green, according to which the editors of Modern Language Review permit a maximum of three reviews by any one person in a year.

Improved to Good Article status by Krakkos (talk). Self-nominated at 11:38, 28 February 2021 (UTC).

  • Approve Alt1 This is a GA review passed article that did so on the 28th and nominated on the same day, so is new enough. Obviously, it is long enough because of that. The article reads neutrally and has proper usage of in-line citations (again, unsurprising for a GA). The copyvio tool found no issues as well. I'm going to go with Alt1 as being the more interesting one and it is properly cited in-line, so no problems there. The QPQ has been done and there's no image to review. Looks good to go! SilverserenC 18:14, 28 February 2021 (UTC)