Template:Did you know nominations/John Caples
Appearance
<
Template:Did you know nominations
This template may meet Wikipedia's criteria for speedy deletion as a page where the author of the only substantial content has requested deletion or blanked the page in good faith. See CSD G7.
If this template does not meet the criteria for speedy deletion, please remove this notice. This page was last edited by SafariScribe (contribs | logs) at 14:05, 25 June 2024 (UTC) (36 minutes ago) |
DYK toolbox |
---|
John Caples
... thatOCLC 679458285.
ALT1: ... thatOCLC 679458285.
- Reviewed:
Moved to mainspace by SafariScribe (talk).
Number of QPQs required: 0. Nominator has less than 5 past nominations.
Safari ScribeEdits! Talk! 06:46, 17 June 2024 (UTC).
- Comment We cannot say in Wikipedia voice that something "was one of the 100 greatest advertisements of all time". If a source has made this claim, it could be said "has been considered by so-and-so to be one of the 100 greatest advertisements of all time", but as of now it is a statement of opinion. This isn't a full review, but the hook as it stands certainly cannot go on the main page. Trainsandotherthings (talk) 19:01, 18 June 2024 (UTC)
- @Trainsandotherthings, No, it's a fact. I also saw the same here in p.6.Safari ScribeEdits! Talk! 19:35, 18 June 2024 (UTC)
- "100 greatest advertisements of all time" is an opinion, not a fact. It is a value judgement not based on an objective criterion that can be evaluated. This is made clear in the source you linked, which says "He has the distinction of having two of his advertisements listed among the 100 greatest of all time" which is cited to a 1959 book entitled "100 Greatest Advertisements" by one Julian Watkins. You are misrepresenting the source and in the process violating WP:NPOV. What is true is that one book published over 50 years ago listed his advertisment as one of the "100 greatest of all time". Trainsandotherthings (talk) 12:26, 19 June 2024 (UTC)
- I have struck ALT0 as a violation of 12:53, 19 June 2024 (UTC)
- This isn't a review, just a comment for now, but ALT1 does not meet WP:DYKINT (it is not interesting given a lack of context) and thus has been struck. Narutolovehinata5 (talk · contributions) 13:26, 24 June 2024 (UTC)
- This isn't a review, just a comment for now, but ALT1 does not meet
- I have struck ALT0 as a violation of 12:53, 19 June 2024 (UTC)
- "100 greatest advertisements of all time" is an opinion, not a fact. It is a value judgement not based on an objective criterion that can be evaluated. This is made clear in the source you linked, which says "He has the distinction of having two of his advertisements listed among the 100 greatest of all time" which is cited to a 1959 book entitled "100 Greatest Advertisements" by one Julian Watkins. You are misrepresenting the source and in the process violating
- @Trainsandotherthings, No, it's a fact. I also saw the same here in p.6.Safari ScribeEdits! Talk! 19:35, 18 June 2024 (UTC)
- Request withdrawnSafari ScribeEdits! Talk! 14:05, 25 June 2024 (UTC)