Template:Did you know nominations/Phoenix, Arizona

Source: Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.
<
Template:Did you know nominations
The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by Gatoclass (talk) 09:39, 31 March 2016 (UTC)

Phoenix, Arizona

Improved to Good Article status by

talk
) at 09:22, 27 March 2016 (UTC).

  • Where is the ALT1 hook fact with an inline cite in the article? Yoninah (talk) 12:25, 27 March 2016 (UTC)
  • @
    flyer
    13:32, 27 March 2016 (UTC)
  • Anyway, I will provide another April Fool's hook:
  • ALT2: ... that
    flyer
    13:38, 27 March 2016 (UTC)
  • Nominated for DYK on same day as received GA icon. New enough, long enough, well referenced, neutrally written, no close paraphrasing seen. Since we did catch that non-referenced statement (ALT1) in the lead, and since Wikipedia is timeless, please provide both a citation and a specific time frame of years or decades for this statement. ALT2 is suitably hooky for April Fools Day; offline hook ref AGF and cited inline. QPQ done. Yoninah (talk) 14:37, 27 March 2016 (UTC)
  • Solved by removing the paragraph from the lead section.
    flyer
    15:24, 27 March 2016 (UTC)
  • OK, someone else added it back with a cite. ALT2 is good to go for April Fools Day. One minute. The second statement is cited, the 4% figure is not. Yoninah (talk) 16:20, 27 March 2016 (UTC)
  •  Done
    flyer
    16:41, 27 March 2016 (UTC)
  • I think my edit summary is clear enough.
    flyer
    17:11, 27 March 2016 (UTC)
  • So far so good. ALT2 good to go for April Fools Day. Yoninah (talk) 19:49, 27 March 2016 (UTC)
  • I would much prefer ALT1 though if it could be verified. Gatoclass (talk) 05:18, 28 March 2016 (UTC)
  • @Gatoclass: I found the ref and added it to the article. However, the 40-year period ended in the mid-2000s. The correct wording would be:
  • ALT3: ... that a bird grew nearly 4% per year over a span of four decades? Yoninah (talk) 16:48, 28 March 2016 (UTC)
  • flyer
    14:59, 30 March 2016 (UTC)