Template:Did you know nominations/Shagdarjavin Natsagdorj
<
Template:Did you know nominations
- The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: promoted by Bruxton talk 05:06, 5 June 2024 (UTC)
| DYK toolbox |
|---|
Shagdarjavin Natsagdorj
- ... that Shagdarjavin Natsagdorjwas appointed director of the Institute of History at the Mongolian Academy of Sciences just two years after being accepted as an apprentice there?
- Source: Ishdorj, Ts. (12 September 2008). Шагдаржав Нацагдорж: Их түүхийг эрхэмлэсэн эрдэмтэн [Shagdarjav Natsagdorj: A scientist who values great history] (in Mongolian). Archived from the original on 31 May 2013. Retrieved 16 May 2024.
Created by AirshipJungleman29 (talk).
Number of QPQs required: 1. Nominator has 19 past nominations.
~~ AirshipJungleman29 (talk) 00:38, 17 May 2024 (UTC).
New, long enough, wonderfully written, and interesting throughout; QPQ done. The source apparently verifies the hook (I used automatic translation on the Mongolian text), but I cannot determine the quality of the source, as the publisher is not identified -- if it self-published, as it looks, I have reservations about its usability anywhere in the article, and especially for sourcing the hook. Also, assuming the source is reliable: the hook is fun and all, but the article has much more interesting facts, which seem to be quoted to much more reliable sources -- how about something on his refusal to criticize Genghis? Dahn (talk) 18:45, 20 May 2024 (UTC)
- Thanks for the review Shagdarjavin Natsagdorj's remarks at an academic conference led to a communist purge and contributed to the Sino-Soviet split? ~~ AirshipJungleman29 (talk) 20:16, 20 May 2024 (UTC)
- I am not doubting Ishdorj's qualifications, but the problem with self-published sources is that they are generally (or universally) below the RS threshold, regardless of who the author is; we generally cannot trust their content to have been edited by anyone, and we technically can't even tell it's an actual article by Ishdorj (it probably is, and as such written in a blog-ish manner, but still...). I won't insist that you remove it from the article, but I would suggest that it should not be used for the front-page hook. Therefore:
for a very interesting ALT1. Dahn (talk) 20:23, 20 May 2024 (UTC)
- Thanks for the review
