Template:Did you know nominations/Spencer Wilson
<
Template:Did you know nominations
- The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: promoted by Cwmhiraeth (talk) 09:53, 6 July 2015 (UTC)
| DYK toolbox |
|---|
Spencer Wilson
- ... that offensive lineman Spencer Wilsonbecame a starter in both 2012 and 2013 as a result of injuries to multiple other players?
- ALT1: ... that left tacklebefore becoming the starting right guard?
- Reviewed: Exempt from QPQ; first nomination
- ALT1: ... that
Created by BU Rob13 (talk). Self-nominated at 07:19, 20 June 2015 (UTC).
The page is long enough and new enough. I prefer the ALT1 hook. This is the user's 2nd DYK nomination, so the QPQ is exempt. The article is neutral and reasonably cited by reliable sources. I'd welcome other feedback, as I have not reviewed a DYK for a very long time (or maybe ever). (Aside: I think it is funny that I was looking to review a DYK after posting Curtis Manning (lacrosse) and I found another Calgary athlete.) --JamesTeterenko (talk) 21:27, 27 June 2015 (UTC)
As a quick comment to make sure this is clear for my future noms, this is my first nomination, not my second. I was the creator of Bryan Burnham, but it was nominated by Tavix, not myself. I assume that's where you believed I had my first nom. Feel free to correct me if you saw something else.Just reread criteria, and it's credits, not noms; you were 100% correct. Ignore that. Now that I'm looking at this again, I also prefer ALT1. Thanks for the review! ~ RobTalk 22:34, 27 June 2015 (UTC)
- Well, you've had 0 that got through DYK (the real criteria), this is the first nomination you have done, and the second article of yours nominated. It passes the QPQ test regardless of which one you use. So, it's all good. -- JamesTeterenko (talk) 06:31, 28 June 2015 (UTC)
