Template:Did you know nominations/Swami Vivekananda and meditation

The following discussion is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: rejected by  — Crisco 1492 (talk) 11:02, 24 November 2013 (UTC)
Close paraphrasing

Vivekananda and meditation

• ... that
  from his childhood and reportedly meditated for a long time on the day of his death
  too?

• Reviewed: Template:Did you know nominations/Mega Mendoeng

Created by Nvvchar (talk), Titodutta (talk). Nominated by Titodutta (talk) at 12:46, 30 September 2013 (UTC).

• Date, length ok. Hook checks out (albeit the latter part is a bit interpretive as the sentence just before the ref says "This was his last meditation", but from context it is clear what the comment refers to). Good to go. --Soman (talk) 02:51, 10 November 2013 (UTC)

• This article includes some close paraphrasing – compare for example "defined mediation, first as of negative nature" versus "meditation should be of a negative nature" – and non-neutral phrasing, and is in significant need of copy-editing. Nikkimaria (talk) 17:03, 11 November 2013 (UTC)

• Despite a ping on the nominator's page over a week ago, no action has been taken aside from a November 12 edit (by Nvvchar, not by Titodutta) that removed the "of negative nature" phrase and fixed a few grammatical issues, but did not effectively address the non-neutral phrasing request or the overall need for a significant copyedit. As this is about eight weeks old now, an extra week's grace seems more than generous. Closing nomination as unsuccessful. BlueMoonset (talk) 00:48, 24 November 2013 (UTC)