Template:Did you know nominations/WRGG-LP

The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by Cwmhiraeth (talk) 05:44, 3 July 2016 (UTC)

WRGG-LP

• ... the father of one of the co-founders of WRGG-LP founded station WKSL?

• ALT1:... that WRGG-LP shares a format and a transmitting tower, with defunct station WKSL, which was created by the father of one of WRGG's co-founders?
• Reviewed: Royal Pier, Southampton

Created by Neutralhomer (talk). Self-nominated at 07:25, 20 June 2016 (UTC).

• Some issues found.
  • ✓ This article is new and was created on 05:17, 20 June 2016 (UTC)
  • ✓ This article meets the DYK criteria at 1918 characters
  • ✓ All paragraphs in this article have at least one citation
  • ✗ This article has the following issues:
    • {{Pennsylvania-radio-station-stub}} from creation
  • ✓ The probability of copyright violation is 1.0%. (confirm)
    • Note to reviewers: There is low confidence in this automated metric, please manually verify that there is no copyright infringement or close paraphrasing. Note that this number may be inflated due to cited quotes and titles which do not constitute a copyright violation.
• ✓ The hook ALT0 is an appropriate length at 73 characters
• ✓ The hook ALT1 is an appropriate length at 147 characters
• ✓ This is Neutralhomer's 8th nomination. A QPQ review of Template:Did you know nominations/Royal Pier, Southampton was performed for this nomination.

Automatically reviewed by DYKReviewBot. This bot is experimental; please report any issues. This is not a substitute for a human review. --DYKReviewBot (report bugs) 23:40, 23 June 2016 (UTC)

• • {{Pennsylvania-radio-station-stub}} template was left on the article by me and by mistake. I have removed the template from the article. Apologizes. - Neutralhomer • Talk • 23:50 on June 23, 2016 (UTC)

• - Neutralhomer - The tag has been dealt with and I can verify the other Bot findings in regards to age, size, sourcing, copyrights, QPQ qualifications. Reading it I'd say it's well written to the DYK criteria as well. If asked to choose I would go with Alt1 as it gives a little more context.  MPJ-DK  01:40, 28 June 2016 (UTC)
  • Awesome, thanks! :) - Neutralhomer • Talk • 01:48 on June 28, 2016 (UTC)