Template talk:Ahnentafel-compact6

This template was considered for deletion on 2017 December 14. The result of the discussion was "keep".

I think this template needs to be modified so as to support the absence of ancestors where in the same generation others are known. For example, ancestors #44 and #45 are not known so their corresponding boxes should disappear like the example shown on

Yes, but I can't think of a single example where it is necessary or desirable to give six generations of someone's complete ancestry anyhow - this template should be eliminated entirely. Agricolae (talk) 14:58, 5 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I'm not sure why one would need to show more than one generation if one could click on the parents and see a one-generation tree of their parents. But desirable? That is harder to predict. I myself would desire suppression of blank fields. I hope that ahnentafel-compact6 can be retained and improved. Thank you. Fotoguzzi (talk) 21:05, 16 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The benefit of this depth of information is that you can compare two people to see if they are related at the distance of fourth cousins. On average, the healthiest offspring are from fourth and especially third cousin marriages. Within wikipedia it is a navigation tool to allow researchers to easily move between pages to examine property and kinship connections. It also makes it easier to research certain social issues such as the derivation of status from renowned ancestors. It also aids in determining factors that may explain events that happened long ago that modern researchers have the tools to better explain. Briefly — it is a simple navigation tool that leverages the data.24.11.170.191 (talk) 12:33, 27 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I have had a go at producing a conditional version of this. Details on Template_talk:Ahnentafel-compact5. Bob1960evens (talk) 18:41, 28 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I have now updated the template with the conditional version. Bob1960evens (talk) 18:34, 5 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]