User talk:24.11.170.191

Page contents not supported in other languages.
Source: Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.

Welcome to Wikipedia!

Hello, and

welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions
. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages you might like to see:

You are welcome to continue editing without logging in, but you may want to consider creating an account. Doing so is free, requires no personal information, and provides several benefits such as the ability to create articles. For a full outline and explanation of the benefits that come with creating an account, please see this page. If you edit without a username, your IP address (24.11.170.191) is used to identify you instead.

In any case, I hope you enjoy editing here and being a

talk) 18:46, 10 September 2014 (UTC)[reply
]

Welcome to Wikipedia: check out the Teahouse!

Teahouse logo
Hello! 24.11.170.191, you are invited to the Teahouse, a forum on Wikipedia for new editors to ask questions about editing Wikipedia, and get support from peers and experienced editors. Please join us! Charles (talk) 17:28, 3 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

October 2014

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Bronislaw Urbański may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "()"s and 1 "{}"s likely mistaking one for another. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:
  • Crimes |publisher=Felsztyn.tripod.com |date= |accessdate=2012-10-03}}</ref> as a Platoon Leader {Polish: ''Plutonowy'') of the ''Dederkaly Baon''. Following the first of September 1939 [[Invasion of Poland]] by Germany,

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow

talk) 18:02, 13 October 2014 (UTC)[reply
]

November 2014

Cadwaladr

I can't find a source for your edit. Please try to source your material and use

talk) 17:20, 24 November 2014 (UTC)[reply
]

Similarly with
WP:VERIFICATION before adding anything else that looks like your personal opinion, however right you believe it to be. Text without reliable sources is likely to be deleted. Thanks. Acabashi (talk) 22:14, 27 November 2014 (UTC)[reply
]
I have responded to your comments on this on my Talk page, there: User talk:Acabashi#Haxey Hood. Acabashi (talk) 00:53, 28 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

December 2014

Information icon Hello, I'm 115ash. I wanted to let you know that I undid one of your recent contributions —the one you made with this edit to Walter de Riddlesford— because it didn’t appear constructive to me. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. 115ash→(☏) 12:27, 20 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for noticing. I needed to find the reference to cite for this interesting connection between the families. The marriage adds additional context to the reasons the families made the alliances they did.24.11.170.191 (talk) 23:51, 8 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

January 2015

reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. Charles (talk) 18:35, 8 January 2015 (UTC)[reply
]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

York is not a typical ancient borough. If you had taken the time to go to the link, you would note that York had obtained an entire wapentake in the 1400s, and that there are a multitude of references cited there. The growth of York and the changes in its government did not happen simply through the municipal reform act in the 1800s. An encyclopedia's main purpose is to direct the reader to additional information, not to gloss over critical events. York's historic growth includes the absorption of Ainsty, a process that took over two hundred years to implement. I do not mind if your improve the sentence and link I wrote. So put it back and do something constructive rather than destructive.24.11.170.191 (talk) 23:40, 8 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Some baklava for you!

Mmmm... Baklava. Why did you need to make a non-constructive edit to the article Robert de Vere, 6th Earl of Oxford, when something as great as Baklava exists! Please don't do it again. EDIT: Although not vandalism, your edit shows that you didn't use the preview button. The preview button can be very useful. k_scheik (talk) 16:45, 5 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, and thank you for your recent contribution. I appreciate the effort you made for our project, but unfortunately I had to undo your edit because I believe the article was better before you made that change. Feel free to contact me directly if you have any questions. Thank you! — | Gareth Griffith-Jones |The WelshBuzzard| — 10:32, 27 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]