Template talk:Bea Miller

Pop music Template‑class

	Pop music portal This template is within the scope of WikiProject Pop music, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of articles related to pop music on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Pop musicWikipedia:WikiProject Pop musicTemplate:WikiProject Pop musicPop music articles
Template	This template does not require a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.

Rock music Template‑class

	Rock music portal This template is within the scope of WikiProject Rock music, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Rock music on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Rock musicWikipedia:WikiProject Rock musicTemplate:WikiProject Rock musicRock music articles
Template	This template does not require a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.

Remove the release year from the albums

Closing per request at
WP:NOCONSENSUS, "In discussions of proposals to add, modify or remove material in articles, a lack of consensus commonly results in retaining the version of the article as it was prior to the proposal or bold edit." Therefore, the release year should be restored until there is a consensus to remove it.
There is no prejudice against starting an RfC to discuss this with a broader group of editors.
Cunard (talk
) 02:27, 1 December 2019 (UTC)

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

There is no need for this. The point of the article is to include the information about the subject, so we don't need to list any here. Miller hasn't released any albums/EPs with the same name, so the release year is pointless in the template. And Jax 0677, the discussion you provided didn't have a consensus so using that as an argument for restoring the release years is insufficient. Billiekhalidfan (talk) 20:20, 1 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Include years - Per this discussion and
WP:BRD, the years should be put back and included, as the navbox was started this way. --Jax 0677 (talk) 16:13, 3 November 2019 (UTC)[reply
]

Despite a lack of consensus previously, and it appears to be headed that way again, it would be nice to have a consistent way of presenting navboxes for musical acts, rather than "I made it so I can do it my way." Years are quite unnecessary as one can simply link to the album to find out when it was released (which is the purpose of a navbox – to navigate to related articles and get more information about them). Starcheerspeaksnewslostwars Talk to me 02:23, 26 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Comment - Without the years in brackets, the album titles without quotation marks run one right into the other. The singles have quotation marks, which prevent them from doing so. If the navbox is horrendously large, then it can be split into an albums navbox and a singles navbox. --Jax 0677 (talk) 18:16, 26 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

They don't run into each other at all. Each one is separated by a dot using a default hlist format and it functions rather well IMO as they have so well in infoboxes for years. Starcheerspeaksnewslostwars^{Talk to me} 19:09, 26 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.