Template talk:California topic

	This template does not require a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:
California This template is within the scope of WikiProject California, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the U.S. state of California on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CaliforniaWikipedia:WikiProject CaliforniaTemplate:WikiProject CaliforniaCalifornia articles

Can someone fix this table so that it disambiguates names of ambiguously named cities and counties? It is currently generating links to the wrong Orange County Sheriff's Department. bd2412 T 15:40, 25 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I'm not sure how many people have used this template, much less are watching this talk page. I modeled it after the {{United States topic}} but I don't think it has an override. Nor have I found a template in Category:Configurable area-topic templates that does. For Georgia, that template just adds " (U.S. state)" to every wikilink, but I don't think that's a very elegant or forward-looking solution. Int21h (talk) 02:05, 26 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Forward-looking in what sense? There will always be other Orange Counties, of equal importance to the one in California. bd2412 T 22:50, 27 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

OK, so are we just going to add a parameter that will automatically add " (California)" to Orange County links? That will properly disambiguate? Int21h (talk) 23:34, 4 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I believe that is how it is done with Georgia links in the European topics template. bd2412 T 23:56, 4 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I've removed the exclude-suffix code from the Orange County line, so it should always now include the state name. We may need to create a few redirects - I'll see if I can track them all down. Bazonka (talk) 19:47, 5 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I've redirected

Orange County, California Fire Department. Hopefully that's all of them. Bazonka (talk) 20:15, 5 February 2014 (UTC)[reply

]

Excellent. Thank you. Int21h (talk) 17:49, 6 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Many of the