Template talk:Condiments
Food and drink Template‑class | ||||||||||||||
|
Category link
I've removed the link to Category:Condiments from this template. Except in specific circumstances (e.g., stubs, cleanup templates), articles shouldn't be directly linked to categories via templates as it reduces the adaptability of articles. In this case, all the articles were directly linked to Category:Condiments with a null pipe, so that they all appeared jumbled up before the start of the alphabetical listing. Also, quite a few of the articles shouldn't have even been in the category, since they were already in subcats. Grutness...wha? 09:00, 28 July 2019 (UTC)
Condiments section
Pinging the template creator
talk) 16:53, 13 December 2020 (UTC)
]
- @Lord Belbury: It is a listing of the condiments that don't fit neatly into one of the subsections in the template. When removing the "Condiments" title from the section (test diff), the template looks a bit disjointed, in my opinion. I prefer it to stay in place. North America1000 06:30, 16 December 2020 (UTC)]
- @talk) 09:38, 16 December 2020 (UTC)]
- @Lord Belbury: Go for it if you feel like it. I'm busy working on other matters for the time being. North America1000 09:46, 16 December 2020 (UTC)]
- Sure, happy to, that wasn't meant to sound like a demand! I wanted to check that I wasn't going against some established and holy trinity of ketchup/mustard/vinegar before attempting it. I'll get on with it as a background edit over the next few days. --talk) 10:30, 16 December 2020 (UTC)]
- Sure, happy to, that wasn't meant to sound like a demand! I wanted to check that I wasn't going against some established and holy trinity of ketchup/mustard/vinegar before attempting it. I'll get on with it as a background edit over the next few days. --
- @
- @
Job done. The subdivisions might not be the best ones, I just went with what occurred to me as I clicked through the list, but it's a start. --
talk) 20:11, 4 January 2021 (UTC)
]