Template talk:Disney's Beauty and the Beast

Page contents not supported in other languages.
Source: Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.

Requested move 2 May 2017

The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the move request was: result was move -- Aunva6talk - contribs 04:16, 9 May 2017 (UTC)(non-admin closure)[reply]



– The main subject for Template:Beauty and the Beast should be the works adapted from the original rather than works derived from the Disney adaptation.

WP:WAWARD) 03:51, 2 May 2017 (UTC)[reply
]

  • @
    WP:WAWARD) 02:31, 5 May 2017 (UTC)[reply
    ]
  • @
    List_of_Disney_theatrical_animated_features#External_links
    ). I think the larger issue is how to handle Disney templates in general when the Disney franchise is a subset of a larger multimedia franchise. There are 4 different ways in which Disney franchises are incorporated into multimedia templates:
  1. Unified templates with Disney content separated: Template:Tarzan and Template:The Jungle Book
  2. Unified templates with Disney content integrated: Template:The Hunchback of Notre Dame, Template:Winnie-the-Pooh, Template:Snow White, Template:Pinocchio, Template:Alice, Template:Peter Pan, Template:Sleeping Beauty, and Template:101 Dalmatians
  3. Embedded templates with Disney template transcluded: Template:The Little Mermaid
  4. Dual templates with some overlap:

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.

@TonyTheTiger:do you need me to use AWB to change the transclusions first, before I make the moves? -- Aunva6talk - contribs 04:19, 9 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

in light of the questions and such, regarding the potential of a differing title, i'm going to wait on moving till i hear back. i'm about to head off for the night, but i'll check in in the morning. doesn't appear that any of the titles brought up were controversial anyhow.-- Aunva6talk - contribs 04:29, 9 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]
I think you are asking about all the pages that have the templates. Yes please change the transclusions and then move the templates.--
WP:WAWARD) 04:31, 9 May 2017 (UTC)[reply
]
did you want it changed to any of the titles that you brought up in the discussion? i.e. disney's?? -- Aunva6talk - contribs 04:43, 9 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]
The discussion above supports the name destination of
WP:WAWARD) 13:04, 9 May 2017 (UTC)[reply
]
I anticipate opening a discussion for an adjustment of the whole batch of Disney templates at
WP:WAWARD) 13:11, 9 May 2017 (UTC)[reply
]
well, i'll get started then. i'll just move it to the proposed title in the discussion. -- Aunva6talk - contribs 14:29, 9 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]
WP:WAWARD) 18:07, 9 May 2017 (UTC)[reply
]
uhhh... it's already moved. i can do another move for that. that's what i was trying to ascertain... since you filed the RM under the (disney), but there was some discussion as to an alternative. is that what you would prefer?— Preceding unsigned comment added by Aunva6 (talkcontribs) 19:31, 9 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]
The alternative is what seems to be supported by the discussion so that seems to be what the consensus would prefer.--
WP:WAWARD) 20:34, 9 May 2017 (UTC)[reply
]
well, okay, i'll move it again. -- Aunva6talk - contribs 20:41, 9 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]
WP:WAWARD) 21:28, 9 May 2017 (UTC)[reply
]
look again. i changed all the transclusions first -- Aunva6talk - contribs 21:38, 9 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]