Template talk:Infobox command structure

Page contents not supported in other languages.
Source: Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.
WikiProject iconMilitary history Template‑class
WikiProject iconThis template is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.
TemplateThis template does not require a rating on the project's quality scale.
Additional information:
Note icon
No existing task force includes this article in its scope; to propose a new one, please leave a message on the main project talk page.

Box title

Can we drop the words "Command structure of" from the infobox title? I used this box for the organizational structure of the Revolutionary Insurrectionary Army of Ukraine and the phrase command structure is misleading. Jacob Haller 21:45, 1 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Ok, done. Kirill Lokshin 22:12, 1 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Wow. Thanks! —The preceding
unsigned comment was added by Jacob Haller (talkcontribs) 22:18, 1 March 2007 (UTC).[reply
]

Again, "subordinate units" creates problems, e.g. for some small allied contingents, cooperating partisan units, etc. Jacob Haller 12:41, 2 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Fine with me; I don't really care all that much either way. Kirill 15:27, 2 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Request to amend Infobox command structure to add State parameter

Per discussion at

United_States_Army_Research,_Development_and_Engineering_Command does not hide while box at United States Army Communications-Electronics Command always hides (even if |state is set to |state=uncollapsed ) Thanks. ArmyRetired (talk) 12:10, 11 July 2011 (UTC)[reply
]

The automatic show/hide behavior is tied to the number of collapsible templates on a page. If I recall correctly, the default setting is that a single template (as on —note the navigation box at the bottom) will be collapsed.
Considering that this template is usually used as a single auxiliary infobox, would it make sense for it to always appear uncollapsed? Kirill [talk] [prof] 15:29, 12 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]