Template talk:Lang-ko

Template:Lang-ko is permanently protected from editing because it is a heavily used or highly visible template. Substantial changes should first be proposed and discussed here on this page. If the proposal is uncontroversial or has been discussed and is supported by consensus, editors may use {{edit template-protected}} to notify an administrator or template editor to make the requested edit. Any contributor may edit the template's sandbox. This template does not have a testcases subpage. You can create the testcases subpage here.

This template does not require a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Korea This template is within the scope of WikiProject Korea, a collaborative effort to build and improve articles related to Korea. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how use this banner, please refer to the documentation.KoreaWikipedia:WikiProject KoreaTemplate:WikiProject KoreaKorea-related articles Writing systems This template falls within the scope of WikiProject Writing systems, a WikiProject interested in improving the encyclopaedic coverage and content of articles relating to writing systems on Wikipedia. If you would like to help out, you are welcome to drop by the project page and/or leave a query at the project’s talk page.Writing systemsWikipedia:WikiProject Writing systemsTemplate:WikiProject Writing systemsWriting system articles

This edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request.

Please replace the contents of this template with the contents of

• DONE and cut 8 interwiki links now in Wikidata. -Wikid77 14:16, 18 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request.

Please replace the contents of this template with the contents of the sandbox, to which I have added |lit={{{lit|}}}, which adds an option to include a literal translation. This makes this template consistent with the template’s documentation following this proposal for the parameter's inclusion. Thank you, Ry's the Guy ^{(talk|contribs)} 08:55, 16 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

 Done though the version in the sandbox has two more close-curly-brackets than are needed. -- John of Reading (talk) 09:31, 16 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]