Template talk:Oz
Novels Template‑class | |||||||
|
inactive. | ||
NA | This article has been rated as NA-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. |
Children's literature Template‑class | ||||||||||||||
|
Wicked
Wicked and its sequels, all non-canonical are less releavent to this template than the original Oz books. I propose that they either be deleted or the original Oz books listed. --Scottandrewhutchins (talk) 19:55, 6 November 2008 (UTC)
Nevertheless, the "canon" of Oz has always been a rather loose concept. I propose that Gregory Maguire be included in the list of authors. 68.148.173.40 (talk) 08:16, 14 September 2012 (UTC)
Wasn't Baum the author of some books?
You'd never know it looking at the template. Evidently the parodies make fun of the movies.Varlaam (talk) 00:21, 11 February 2011 (UTC)
- Yes, you would if you actually looked at it.--Scottandrewhutchins (talk) 17:48, 11 February 2011 (UTC)
- Bugger off, and put the bloody books in the template.
- And mind your manners. Varlaam (talk) 06:35, 12 February 2011 (UTC)
- Apparently, the sarcasm got away from some here. It currently looks like baums books are properly represented.Mercurywoodrose (talk) 06:15, 2 December 2011 (UTC)
The Wonderful Wizard of Oz (2011)
Which film is this? is it the adaption slated for 2012, mentioned at
recent changes
DoctorHver, what did "reimaged" mean? – Jonesey95 (talk) 13:42, 22 August 2021 (UTC)
- It was supposed too mean Reimagining i.e those films that don't fit in with the oz cannon one way or another. DoctorHver (talk) 14:33, 22 August 2021 (UTC)
Thompson books
Shouldn't Yankee and Enchanted Island be grouped with Thompson's other books? Goustien (talk) 03:49, 5 August 2022 (UTC)