United States v. Florida East Coast Railway Co.
United States v. Florida East Coast Railway Co. | |
---|---|
Court membership | |
| |
Case opinions | |
Majority | Rehnquist, joined by Burger, Brennan, White, Marshall, Blackmun |
Dissent | Douglas, joined by Stewart |
Powell took no part in the consideration or decision of the case. | |
Laws applied | |
Interstate Commerce Act |
United States v.
Due to a chronic freight car shortage, Congress had enlarged the scope of the Interstate Commerce Commission's authority to prescribe per diem rate charges for the use of one company's freight car by another, thus giving an incentive to each company to use the cars more efficiently or to acquire more freight cars. The Commission, in passing the regulation, had allowed railroads 60 days to file statements of position on the matter. The Commission had said: "that any party requesting oral hearing shall set forth with specificity the need therefore and the evidence to be adduced." Several railroads filed statements requesting oral hearings, but the Commission did not hold further hearings and overruled the requests.
Two railroad companies brought an action in the
The Supreme Court reversed the District Court's decision.
The Court distinguished between administrative rulemaking and administrative adjudications. Since there had been no effort to single out a particular railroad, the court found the agency's action was of a basically legislative type judgment as opposed to an adjudication which could entail due process hearing rights.
The Court referred to its decision in Bi-Metallic Investment Co. v. State Board of Equalization in which it held that no hearing at all was constitutionally required prior to a decision by state tax officers in Colorado to increase the valuation of all taxable property in Denver by a substantial amount.
Justice Douglas joined by Justice Stewart dissented finding that the Railroads had not been afforded hearings guaranteed by Section 1(14)(a) of the Interstate Commerce Act and 5 U.S.C. Sections 553, 556, and 557.
External links
- Text of United States v. Florida East Coast Railway Co., 410 U.S. 224 (1973) is available from: Justia Library of Congress Oyez (oral argument audio)