User:Aisheee

Source: Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.

Hi, I am Aisheee

Motto: Facts are the best 💪 🥳

I will use this page primarily for highlighting anything that is off logic, fact-devoid on Wikipedia.


Some examples that .... will sing of humanity's injustice long after there is no life on Earth

Killing of Latasha Harlins

Emmett Till

Ruchika Girhotra case

Lynching of Jesse Washington

George Stinney


Attempts at adding content through talk pages

Semi-protected edit request on 16 March 2022 (2) This edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. Change the term from militant to terrorist Sam7297 (talk) 12:12, 16 March 2022 (UTC)

Not done for now: please establish a consensus for this alteration before using the {{edit semi-protected}} template. ScottishFinnishRadish (talk) 12:15, 16 March 2022 (UTC)

Adding arguments, as part of discussion to establish consensus. According to some articles, Definition of militant: Someone who funds terrorists and uses verbal violence. According to some articles, Definition of terrorist: Someone who engages in violence. However, according to Wikipedia, there is " no universal agreement about it" [1] Therefore, proving that he is a terrorist would be as vague as proving that he is a "he" and not a "she" (we do not have a genital check-up record but based on the images and so on we infer he is a male). Therefore, based on all the citations he does seem to classify as a terrorist [2] Someone who spreads terror. Thoughts? Aisheee (talk) 23:06, 20 August 2022 (UTC)

Hello ScottishFinnishRadish still here? Aisheee (talk) 23:14, 22 August 2022 (UTC) Generally we don't use that label unless it is specifically used in a vast majority of sources. ScottishFinnishRadish (talk) 00:03, 23 August 2022 (UTC) Sometimes it just feels that when the tide is not in their favor, the wiki admins just prefer to ignore rather than make changes they don't "like" :/ Welp. I tried to "discuss" Aisheee (talk) 17:11, 25 August 2022 (UTC) Sorry for some reason your reply was not shown at the time when I wrote the above message. It was anyway a feeling in general not for a specific wiki admin. Finding sources to back up the tag (if I don't find, that means no change can be done anyway). thanks! Aisheee (talk) 18:00, 25 August 2022 (UTC) Hello. So here are some articles upon a search [3] [4] [5] Citation for definitions of militants vs terrorists [6]. The person killed by him, and the other people he claimed he killed, were civilians. Also, His case was handled as per Terrorist and Disruptive Activities (Prevention) Act) (the judge added that the release after 16 years was due to the prosecution not showing interest in arguing the case and interviewing the witnesses [7][8]) Keeping all these in mind, he is a terrorist in all definition (reference= [9] Coincidentally and notably, this last reference also refers to him as "terrorist") Aisheee (talk) 19:46, 25 August 2022 (UTC) Officially giving up on this. Copy pasting to my talk page as a reminder of how wiki functions Aisheee (talk) 17:09, 29 August 2022 (UTC)

_______________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

Improved phrasing of a sentence based on facts: Story centered around a fictional student character, not simply Fictional story

The 3 articles cited in the second sentence of the article do not mention that it is a fictional story. They instead mention that it is a "fictional story of a student". There is a difference between calling one character fictional (through whom the story is being narrated) and calling the entire movie's storyline fictional- where real-life people such as Yasin Malik [1] , Farooq Ahmed Dar [2], Girija Tickoo [3] [4], BK Ganjoo [5] and several others have been portrayed. The idea behind the sentence is correct and intends to be based on facts. However, is phrased in a misleading manner. More appropriately- It is a storyline inspired by real events, centered around the fictional story of a student. Aisheee (talk) 22:21, 20 August 2022 (UTC)

Hello? Let's call a spade a spade? Aisheee (talk) 23:13, 22 August 2022 (UTC)

Did you read the footnote [a]? -- Kautilya3 (talk) 17:28, 23 August 2022 (UTC)

Yes. And it is not related to the facts and logic I presented. Disclaimers do not have a retroactive effect on reality. Will you now delete all articles and citations related to the real life people I mentioned above, because a movie that portrays them has this disclaimer? My argument is purely objective and logic based not subjective inferences based. 🙏 Thanks Now back to the topic: What I mentioned is that clearly the student character who is the central character of the movie is a fictional character. But the movie contains several real instances "additionally". So, the sentence should be "Story centered around a fictional student character", not simply "it is a Fictional story" Aisheee (talk) 17:05, 25 August 2022 (UTC)

Any wiki admins willing to include it based on logic and irrespective of preference? 👋 Aisheee (talk) 17:08, 29 August 2022 (UTC) Aisheee (talk) 17:06, 29 August 2022 (UTC)

@Aisheee Admins have no special authority over policy compliant content. And we follow the sources, not logic, which would be original researxh. Doug Weller talk 17:54, 29 August 2022 (UTC)

You don't consider the references as sources? My logic is based on sources. I feel like .. i don't know depressed I think M gonna log out for good it makes no sense. There are millions of edits getting approved everyday with fewer sources. Aisheee (talk) 13:15, 30 August 2022 (UTC)


_________________ My personality and key to happiness is to simply get away from trouble And that's what I am doing https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:The_Kashmir_Files#Improved_phrasing_of_a_sentence_based_on_facts%3A_Story_centered_around_a_fictional_student_character%2C_not_simply_Fictional_story


Enjoy editing everyone

Cheers to all the millions of reads here everyday of unsupported facts, cheers to authoritarian edits and cheers to every time we see somewhere "wiki is not a reliable source, please use another" - I'll drink to that

Every morning I read news anyway, not wiki