User:Jheald/sandbox/GA

Source: Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.

Current targets:

  • The mixed multivector ((sin(θ) + cos(θ) e1), created by the "flattening" the e3 direction on right-multiplying by the primitive idempotent (1+ e3). What does this mixed multivector mean? Why might projective space be a clue?
  • Conformal geometric algebra -- as the place to look, so see what projective transformations come up
  • Weyl & Brauer's decomposition of rotations -- what exactly were their steps, & how did their spinors get used?
  • "
    Isotropic space
    " -- i.e. (most often) one with mixed signature. Why are Cartan's spinors considered so embedded in such a space? Is there a relation with Cl+(p,q)Cl(p-2,q+1).
  • The non-columnlike reappropriation of the word "spinor" by several GA books: document,
  • "Geometric algebra" vs. "Clifford algebra" -- write up results of reading survey for Talk:Geometric algebra.
  • Wigner D matrix
    -- put "change of basis" into the intro. Non-integer-valued spherical harmonics?


Scratchpad for pages where adding a GA perspective might be useful, or where existing GA material might usefully be tweaked.

  • Bott periodicity
    -- off-puttingly mathematical at the moment. Some more general remarks/conclusions would be good to float higher up, to give people an idea of what it means. (Is the pseudo-scalar the key to this? eg: its square, square of its reverse, etc; also chirality).
  • Dirac operator -- per expansion suggestion on talk page
  • Cauchy-Riemann equations -- scratchpad at User:Jheald/sandbox/GA/Cauchy-Riemann add -- though might work better in an expanded Dirac operator
     ?
  • Clifford analysis -- needs further wiki-formatting at the least. Why the use of Cl0,1 as the basic signature? Says FT is a problem for real-valued CAs. But is complex everything the right way to go? Or do we need to introduce another (real) dimension, or set of dimensions, giving imaginaries with more closely controlled meanings? Probably leave any more here till after Dirac operator.
  • Pauli matrices -- add more physics?
  • Clifford module -- what is this?
    • We used to have an explicit construction somewhere for representations of Clifford algebras / spin matrices -- where did it go?
Found it: [4]; was rm'd from the page as "nonstandard". Not all the representations are faithful (a.k.a. "universal" in the language of the page)
Instead there are Higher-dimensional gamma matrices and Weyl–Brauer matrices.
Woit [5] introduces a "Mathematical finds" by Baez [6]

Some good GA pages

Websites

  • [8] Czech page with good bibliography / links


GA contributors

also try