User:Mathglot/sandbox/Drafts/Using medical database collections

Source: Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.

Wikipedia includes many pages containing biomedical content. Information about identifying reliable sources for such content can be found at Wikipedia:Identifying reliable sources (medicine). This page provides some methods and resources for using medical database collections in order to find and evaluate reliable sources for biomedical information.

Background

The Wikipedia guideline on Identifying reliable sources on bio medical content supports the general sourcing policy with specific attention to what is appropriate for medical content in any Wikipedia article. This

Ideal sources for biomedical information include: review articles (especially systematic reviews) published in reputable medical journals; academic and professional books written by experts in the relevant fields and from respected publishers; and guidelines or position statements from national or international expert bodies. Primary sources should generally not be used for medical content – as such sources often include unreliable or preliminary information, for example early lab results which don't hold in later clinical trials.

Besides general search engines like

guidelines on biomedical content
. Individual collections have their strong and weak points, and indiviual documents returned by search need to be vetted like any other source for compliance.

Searchable collections with biomedical content

This section lists database collections which may contain reliable sources for certain queries. They are all searchable, and each has their own algorithm for returning results deemed most relevant for the user query. Most will return a mix of results from

reliable sources for biomedical content
.

Evaluating and comparing collections

This section contains tips and advice on how to decide which database collections are likely to have the best results for the article or topic you are researching.

Evaluating sources from search results

This section explains how to evaluate sources returned in the search results for a given collection to identify if it is

WP:MEDRS
-compliant.

See also

Notes

  1. Cochrane database of systematic reviews
  2. ^ a b Subscription required for full-text access; better access available via Wikipedia Library (please log in first).

Lock icons: