User:Nathan.brenn/Evaluate an Article
![]() | Evaluate an article
Complete your article evaluation below. Here are the key aspects to consider: Lead sectionA good lead section defines the topic and provides a concise overview. A reader who just wants to identify the topic can read the first sentence. A reader who wants a very brief overview of the most important things about it can read the first paragraph. A reader who wants a quick overview can read the whole lead section.
ContentA good Wikipedia article should cover all the important aspects of a topic, without putting too much weight on one part while neglecting another.
Tone and BalanceWikipedia articles should be written from a neutral point of view; if there are substantial differences of interpretation or controversies among published, reliable sources, those views should be described as fairly as possible.
Sources and ReferencesA Wikipedia article should be based on the best sources available for the topic at hand. When possible, this means academic and peer-reviewed publications or scholarly books.
Organization and writing qualityThe writing should be clear and professional, the content should be organized sensibly into sections.
Images and Media
Talk page discussionThe article's talk page — and any discussions among other Wikipedia editors that have been taking place there — can be a useful window into the state of an article, and might help you focus on important aspects that you didn't think of.
Overall impressions
Examples of good feedbackA good article evaluation can take a number of forms. The most essential things are to clearly identify the biggest shortcomings, and provide specific guidance on how the article can be improved. |
Article #1
Community gardening in the United States
Why you have chosen this article to evaluate?
This article is quite specific to my sector and the need that it addresses. On this page, they discuss the history and impact of community gardening in the US with examples given. I believe I could add value to this page and improve on all the information already present.
Evaluate the article
This page has a solid baseline structure that includes a detailed overview defining community garden and its role in the United States. They give a well rounded history of community gardening and its trajectory throughout American history, including its ties to post-war eras and food provisioning. The following sections discuss the benefits of community gardening and what problems it addresses. This section could benefit from more elaboration in the "Cultural" section because it is quite limited in scope/lacks detail. The next section gives countless examples of states and cities that have integrated community gardening into their city planning, out of necessity or recreation. They discuss more established organizations on a broad scale rather than specific organizations. Perhaps including some case studies would beneficial present community farms in the most accurate light. Overall, the article is quite detailed and while could use some improvement, gives great insights into the role of community gardening in various spaces across the US.
Article #2
Why you have chosen this article to evaluate?
This article is precisely what my PE org is addressing with a slightly more general approach. It seems to be short in length so I will have many opportunities to add to the current content.
Evaluate the article
The article has comprehensive information about urban agriculture and peri-urban agriculture. It discusses in depth the main principles of UA, its potential impacts, and the methods and challenges to implementation. At times, certain sections get sidetracked and begin giving a lot of information about an a different topic. Some sections could be developed further and include some more recent information. Their source seem to be reliable, scholarly sources from what a quick skim can gather. Improvements include making urban agriculture the center, apart from peri-urban agriculture (which should probably only have its dedicated wiki page).