User:ONUnicorn/to do

Source: Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.

Things to do:

Browning Hill/Mountain

  • Find out more about "Special Zone" designation
  • When was the hill discovered? Who named it? What is it named for?
  • Nebo Ridge Trail seems to include part of Browning Hill, at least according to the Indy Hikers people… is the anomaly included in that trail?
  • Off the Beaten Path says scientits and archeologists have investigaged the anomaly, see if you can find out who, when, and what the results of said investigations were.
  • Go for a hike, take a picture. Perhaps also take a picture of the hill from the intersection of Elkinsville and Combs roads. If the anomaly is private, or inaccessible, perhaps see if the people from the one website with a picture of it will let Wikipedia use the picture.
  • Write the article

Toy

  • Proofreading, especially sections on gender and child development.
  • Go to the library and do research; make sure all claims are sourced.
  • Nominate for peer review once everything else is done.
  • [1]

Hammerton Killick and related articles

  • Find some information about his life before 1902
  • Expand Anténor Firmin with info about 1902 incidents
  • Expand Pierre Nord Alexis with info about how he became president
  • Rewrite
    Luders Affair

Create:

References

  1. ^ Cowley, Ric (30 August 2017). "A wolf in sheepskin clothing: How Love Nikki-Dress UP Queen is far more than meets the eye". Pocket Gamer. Retrieved 17 August 2018.

References

  1. ^ "The elusive phenomenon of churches without God". The Economist. 16 May 2018. Retrieved 22 April 2019.
  2. ^ Wheeler, Brian (4 February 2013). "What happens at an atheist church?". BBC News. Retrieved 22 April 2019.
  3. ^ "What are atheist churches?". The Week. 21 May 2018. Retrieved 22 April 2019.
  4. ^ Samuel, Sigal. "Atheists Are Sometimes More Religious Than Christians". The Atlantic. Retrieved 22 April 2019.
  5. ^ Embree, Stephanie (August 2014). "Atheist churches provide a community for Dallas nonbelievers". Dallas News. Retrieved 22 April 2019.

[8]

Expand/rewrite

Clean up:

Sita Devi
Born1914
Madhubani painting
ChildrenRamdev jha , Surya Dev Jha , Mahadev Jha
AwardsPadma Shri
National Award for Crafts
Bihar ratna
Shilp guru Award
  • Sita Devi (Artist) - originally written as a complete copyvio from two sources, I tried to clean it up and tagged it with close paraphrasing, then re-written as a complete copyvio from a third source. Speedy deleted as a copyvio. Re-write as not a copyvio using these sources.[1][2][3]

References

  1. ^ Dutta, Ambarish (14 December 2005). "Madhubani art legend dead". Tribune News Service. Retrieved 20 October 2015.
  2. ^ Avari, Nishad. "Sita Devi: A Legendary Mithila Artist". SaffronArt Blog. Saffron Art. Retrieved 20 October 2015.
  3. ^ Elder, Joseph; Donowitz, Paul; Owens, Raymond (1999). Film Guide: MITHILA PAINTERS: FIVE VILLAGE ARTISTS FROM MADHUBANI, INDIA (PDF). Retrieved 23 November 2015.
  • The Raw Story
    - not a neutral presentation of the subject.
  • Office supplies - nothing makes me happier than office supplies. This article needs work.
  • Draft:Acharya Vishveshwar, Siddhant Shiromani - In theory collaborate w/creator; clean up massive amount of editorializing and source the article appropriately.

Extra QPQs

*Template:Did you know nominations/Sālote Lupepauʻu

Summarising/Analysing Arbcom decisions

As you've been studying for Bar exams you've almost certainly been reading the sort of legal textbooks that go into very precise details of exactly what a particular decision actually said, and what it was later interpreted to say.

I was wondering if you'd be willing to make a slightly serious analysis (in the same vien) of some of the more prominent Arbcom cases on the basis that the Arbcom is a good working example of a semi-formalised 'dispute-resolution' process, even if it's not a legal body like a formal arbitration panel would be. ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 13:29, 1 August 2016 (UTC)

@
problem solving
14:38, 2 August 2016 (UTC)
I was thinking more in terms of how the decisions were arrived at from the 'facts' of the case, and what the decisions decided the Wikipedia policy direction in future (i.e after the decision). A number of Arbcom cases also implemented specific General and Discretionary Sanctions, and it would be useful to have some basis to compare any future decisions, even though Arbcom is not like actual judicial boides bound to follow a precedent it sets (That said, many Arbcom decisions have drawn on past ones.) . To borrow the (London) Times legal reporting style for an example " 'Where a long term vandalising account had previously used multiple accounts previously, it was reasonable practice on the part of Wikipedia admin, to request a check user for any new suspected accounts of the same account holder.' So ruled the Arbitration Committe of the English Wikipedia' in respect of ... The request for Arbitration had arisen because... In reaching this decison, Arbcom considered that... "

with the obvious expansions, of course. Arbitraion requests to some extent are the 'caselaw' of Wikipedia policy, compared to the 'written polices' (the 'book-law/legal code') and unwritten but generally followed customary practices.

Analysing the Arbcom 'process' itself would be something different entirly, but if you were wanting to write in that area as well, I can't really stop you. ;) ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 21:15, 4 August 2016 (UTC)

Research and possibly nominate for AFD

(All three of the above seem mildly promotional and possibly not notable. Adam Kamani is by a sockpuppet of an undisclosed paid editing ring. The other two may be also. All are about British fashion, and all assert the subjects have won the same minor award. Research the award, determine if it is notable. If so, write an article about it, which strengthens the case for notability of the subjects of the above articles. If the award is not notable, evaluate each article subject independently to determine notability, and nominate for AFD if they aren't notable. If they are notable, rewrite the articles to eliminate UPE concerns.)

Merge

This AFD was closed as redirect. The mall in question is mentioned briefly in the target article, but with no real information about it and entirely unsourced. Merge some of the content and sources from the pre-redirect mall article to the article on the town. However, it will need to be considerably shortened and condensed to avoid overwhelming the town article with information on the mall.