Image for an article

Category:Wikipedia_requested_photographs? There's a dozen categories for ideas. Maybe you have a free image hanging about that could be used, or you flick to a random article and see it needs one. Don't forget you can skip the task if you need to, but give me a good reason why. :) Rcsprinter (message) 16:34, 8 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Well, there's this. — Isarra (talk) 05:38, 10 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Cool, well done.  Task complete. Going to find a wikiproject next? Rcsprinter (chat) 14:04, 10 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Wikiproject

Random questionsIf that's all right; there have just been some things I've been wondering about.

• On RfCs, AfDs, and other discussions, is it at all useful to come in, see someone who says something that seems very sensible, and then just say, 'I agree with that guy', but not have anything to add? On one hand it seems kind of redundant, but on the other hand, if people are after consensus...? — Isarra (talk) 01:07, 8 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
• Wikicup - what is that actually for? If you're taking part, perhaps you could say: does it motivate you? And/or if not, does it seem to motivate others? Or is it just a fun thing to do because why not? sort of thing? — Isarra (talk) 01:07, 8 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

People are allowed to say that they agree with somebody, they can either give reasons or just leave it at that. In AfDs, it is the strength of the argument that counts, not the number of !votes, so it is redundant in those, but in RfAs and such, it is the number of votes that count to give consensus, so in those you can say, 'Support as per Thatguy. ~~~~'

The wikicup is not really for anything, it just encourages editors to write content with a slightly competitive edge. It's fun too, motivating probably to those who get the high points. Have you entered it? If not, consider entering next year, it's a great way to get writing content. Rcsprinter (message) 16:34, 8 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

It may be allowed, but is it useful? Demonstrate that yeah, this is a shared notion, or something, I dunno. On the other hand, if it is, wouldn't whoever closes the thing have some sense of it anyway? Anyhow,I'm not really much of a content person, mon. —

page seems pretty vague. — Isarra (talk) 20:10, 10 March 2012 (UTC)[reply

]

If I want to have a three- or more-way discussion with multiple editors to whom the subject is specific, is there any right way to do that? — Isarra (talk) 20:10, 10 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Could you please remove the bouncy logo from your talkpage? When there's a banner or sitenotice, that just moves the image down further; it's currently covering the entire man navigation (as opposed to the most of it that it was previously). — Isarra (talk) 20:10, 10 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

(Sorted on IRC) Rcsprinter (state) 16:59, 12 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

• So what now? Is this the point where I wander off to some other project and get buried in backlogs? Because that always winds up utterly sucking. I can feel it, though... commons is calling to me... calling... Ghack! But seriously, er... that one thing. Yes. So much backlog... AAAGHH! — Isarra (talk) 06:24, 12 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Well, you can if you want, it's a free wiki. What we are going to do in the next stage of your adoption is have a talk about you as an editor. What are your prime motivations? What do you like editing/doing? Do you spend a lot of time here. Discuss. :) Rcsprinter (state) 16:59, 12 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Note to anyone who reads this: the questions above have been answered on IRC.

Random

*Rcsprinter hugs Isarra.

Thank you. >.<  — Isarra (talk) 20:49, 18 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Right, shall we get this moving again? Let's move on to some actual lessons before some tasks (remember your current one is just to help out at #wikipedia-en-help when you can). How good are you at copyright? Would you like help explaining the rules? Or if not we can do templates, or maybe something else. This is a very loose adoption course where I just help you with stuff you don't know, so just ask. I'll make a better editor of you yet, Isarra! Rcsprinter (talkin' to me?) 15:24, 28 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I'm paying attention. Totally. And man, things get weird when I put the spellchecker in the wrong language... but anyway, yes. Helpfulness. Usually there've been other folks handling things, so I'm inclined to leave it in their capable hands when they're there. And copyright... copyright is a horrific pain in the arse. CC is generally straight-forward enough, but GFDL has some damn strange stipulations and whatnot to the point where I'd rather just no touch it. I've been cleaning up and verifying file descriptions of files moved to Commons, and the bulk of them are just... whaaaat? So I've been ignoring those, but I think you get the idea. Applying the sort of thing to text can in a way be even more difficult, though, because how much do people need to change before it's just a reference? And such...

As for the templates here, they horrify me. Nests upon nests, full of switches and parsers and weirdnesses, but at the same time it's actually rather elegant, as this keeps them consistent and in form and ensures that people don't do too weird of crap with them... Wikipedia's templates are really rather infamous, you know. But what would you have in mind for the things? So far all I've really done is oggle some of them and go 'hmmm', as well as add filler to a few for a certain white cat. Fellow certainly acts like a cat. It's kind of scary at times.

I don't know anything, though, you know.  — Isarra (talk) 02:50, 29 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Who changes their spellchecker language? Now, you seem to know what you are talking about with CC and GDFL, that's very true. Although we all wish we didn't have to mess about with copyright anytime we upload anything, it's a sad necessary. Good job with the Commons images. Someone will take care of them eventually.

Templates... Yeah, in a word. Most except the most complicated are full of parser functions and switches and stuff, although the syntax is really quite simple when you know what it means. meta:Parser functions can help with anything you don't get, and there's always me. To be honest, most are pretty simple. You don't need a nest, or even any parameters. This sentence was typed using a template. You can just transclude words. OK? Rcsprinter (lecture) 15:48, 29 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Like this? ⧼Watchlistedit-noitems⧽ Well, okay, not really... — Isarra (talk) 19:26, 29 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I was going to say something here, but then I accidentally clicked on something and the software ate everything I'd written. So then I was writing an explanation of that with a summary of what I'd written, but then I accidentally clicked on something else and then it ate that, too. So I give up. — Isarra (talk) 09:36, 2 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Actually, scratch that. I can summarise the summary - place big, me lost, what now? — Isarra (talk) 09:55, 2 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

And another thing, a trend of sorts I'm not liking at all - I'm bad with disagreements. Usually I get annoyed at people instead of trying to see where they're coming from or anything remotely productive; several times I've snapped at actually rather lovely folks (Σ, Ironholds, and Jorm come to mind) on IRC for various reasons that don't really bear going into, and it's not just there, either. On-wiki I've gotten rather irritated with people's !votes on certain discussions (such as mabdul's RfA) and reacted to those, and when I didn't understand what was going on with some templates... point is, how does one not do that? Just back away when it comes to it, at very least not say stupid crap... but how? Looking at ANI, there are plenty of folks who are far worse than I am, but that's still not terribly reassuring; on the other hand there are folks like Worm That Turned who are bloody amazing, and you yourself seem to be pretty good, too... honestly, I'm just at a loss, here, so if you have any ideas or wise words or whatnot... yeah. — Isarra (talk) 09:55, 2 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Task set 2: let's get you in gear

Yeah, that is a common weakness. Some people just

drop the stick

, but you don't seem too bad. Everybody can get on the bad side of nice people if they say the wrong thing, so you're not alone. Mabdul's RfA is a bit of a flop because of all this canvassing rubbish, I agree. In fact you were one of the first to comment! Your words seem pretty true, although I expressed it myself in French (see Support no. 56). Worm That Turned is a hero of mine, one of the best editors around. I wouldn't be surprised if he became a 'crat before the year is out. Thanks for calling me amazing, I really mean it. Right... tasks!

• Keep helping in #wikipedia-en-help when possible
• Participate in at least two AfD debates with reasoned comments. Please provide diffs in your reply.

That'll be all for now. Rcsprinter (converse) 11:25, 2 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Funny you should bring up AfD - there are a couple articles I've been bemused at for awhile now, and while AfD seemed the thing, it also confused the hell out of me. See, I came across

RaWrite2 awhile ago when an IP reverted a prior redirection of them, stating that they had in fact not been merged at all. Being thoroughly confused by the thing, I went and asked the guy who'd redirected them in the first place what his reasoning was and what he thought of the situation. His response was thus, which seems sensible enough, but also leaves me a little lost. On one hand it doesn't even seem worth bothering with at all, especially since such software articles are apparently pretty normal, but on the other hand, the guy's right; they ain't notable, and redirecting them resolved it nicely previously. Should I take them to AfD, or just revert the IP, or ignore it, or what? — Isarra (talk) 04:15, 4 April 2012 (UTC)[reply

]

Also, with regard to some of the other stuff, argh. Thank you, but argh. I usually only help in -help when nobody else is around, though... something about how they seem so hopeless. Then again, it's probably needed most then. Then again again, that also means there's nobody to bail me out when I monumentally screw up... um.

Less to the point, WTT would make a boring crat... but boring crats are generally a very good thing. *shifty eyes* — Isarra (talk) 04:23, 4 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

My, you're good at writing lengthy paragraphs! For the -help task, just try helping a bit more often, and if I'm not there when you do it I'll take your word for it. As for the AfD task, if you don't know where to find them, go to WP:AFD/Latest and there should be a log of all the latest AfD discussions. Reply back here! Rcsprinter (natter) 11:27, 5 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry. I'd make them shorter, but I'm no good at that. No good at a lot of things, for that matter, like not

WP:CANVASSING as I link this: Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/RaWrite

. Whoops.

More seriously, there's this one, but since I forgot to link any acronyms I doubt anyone will take me seriously. — Isarra (talk) 08:41, 6 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Well, the first one is good, you nominated something for deletion, but bad because that wasn't the task; One more please. Second one top marks, although you are right in saying you ought to link to a policy to back up your statement, although that isn't mandatory. Rcsprinter (Gimme a message) 11:36, 6 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

And can you deny starting something is participation? Regardless, I'll get to another, but for now I must ask - when starting the things, who all ought to be notified, do you suppose? — Isarra (talk) 04:49, 7 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Technically, but I asked for comments. Notified, usually the page creator or major contributors. Rcsprinter (state) 12:12, 8 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Well, here are some comments. — Isarra ༆ 19:32, 8 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hey, two more!  Task complete. Rcsprinter (talk to me) 19:34, 8 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

• Well, continue being on IRC and vandal fighting, we can do some more tasks after I've caught up after you for a chat. :) Rcsprinter (state) 11:48, 12 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

And something else...

	The Anti-Vandalism Barnstar
	I see you mastered Huggle today! Lets hope many vandals in the future have you to reckon with! Rcsprinter (lecture) 17:40, 3 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I don't think I care much for huggle, though it makes for something not entirely terrible with which to sidetrack during lecture. A js with similar queue-generating and -handling capabilities, however, would be very nice. Slap that on Special:BlankPage and let whatever handle the rest... pity I'd be too incompetent to write that. — Isarra (talk) 02:21, 4 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Maybe

Igloo would be more to your taste. Rcsprinter (natter) 11:27, 5 April 2012 (UTC)[reply

]

My apologies; I'm doing it again. Thank you for the pointer. >.< — Isarra (talk) 14:14, 5 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

And the pointy. —

BLP noticeboard

are some suggestions. Also the RfCs although we can look at those another time; I hope I'm not overwhelming you with too much stuff all at once!

Next, I'm going to set you a kind of goal that isn't a task as such, and you can take as long as you like on it. Simply... create an article. Anything you like. You can discuss ideas with me here, and I'll help you write it (but not actually insert content, it's your task) in your userspace, or wherever. Reply back here! Yours truly, Rcsprinter (message) 16:31, 25 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Mmm, quite, though a lot of my questions have been winding up on IRC lately, sometimes not even publicly given the nature of a few of them. Perhaps I should stop asking about the administration of this poor place, though. It shouldn't affect me, should it? And if I have to ask if something's a bad idea, it probably is, isn't it... like trying to get arbcom to take a case about someone I don't even know would be a bad idea, wouldn't it?

Mmm, and WP:AN and WP:ANI are fun ones. Very entertaining reads. Also somewhat reassuring, since I often find I can point at something there and say to myself, hey, at least I'm not that bad. Does that make me a horrible person?

I have taken a gander at a few RfCs, but I've often found I just don't feel comfortable commenting due to a lack of familiarity with the areas, or I just can't bring myself to care one way or another. What does it matter how you capitalise that stuff? Can't people sust pick something already and be consistent, for crying out loud...

I do have an idea for an article, but that will have to wait until next week, possibly later. We'll see, though. Yes. Zulch! — Isarra ༆ 22:34, 4 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Very serious reads at WP:AN and WP:ANI. It's basically turned into a place for people to have long meaningless rants and argue with the admins, and then get blocked. That does not make you a horrible person. Oh no.

Common point with the RfCs, sometimes it's not worth getting involved. And very good with the article; I know you have a lot of coursework at the moment so I won't hurry you... I'll be here. Rcsprinter (Gimme a message) 11:07, 5 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Yay! -— Isarra ༆ 19:42, 6 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

So I got sidetracked...

Okay - maybe not. Good job for trying and finding it though; even though I hadn't assigned it you yet! We'll try that after achieving some more goals and having more lessons and when we both have more time. Rcsprinter (constabulary) 10:39, 5 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Some day I strive to become an experienced

WP:WIKILAWYER. — Isarra ༆ 15:46, 5 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Shall we get started on this article, then? What is your idea? Rcsprinter (gossip) 10:33, 12 May 2012 (UTC)[reply

]

I'd be happy to let you know once I've done some research; for now I'd rather not commit to anything until I'm certain that the topic meets GNG. Completely unrelatedly to anything at all, I also don't suppose I could interest you in washing a fairly bushy 2m tall palm tree for me? It's really dirty. Covered in... stuff. Also needs to be oiled for some reason, and I've never oiled a tree before. Not really relishing the idea of it, either, as unlike with an article, I have no idea where to even start with that.

That said, mon, I have to ask - would you be willing to consider my graduation at this point? I've learned enough to know my way around the wiki at this point, generally speaking, and for anything less clear that might come up, well, I know who I can ask. What say you? -— Isarra ༆ 08:25, 17 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

That's good, I'll be here whenever you are. Now who washes palm trees? Can't they look after themselves? I don't know anything about them and can't help you with it, because you happen to be in a different continent. :) Starting an article? Write down your sources on the page you're writing it on, and expand on them. Maybe see the way it started in userspace for some of User:Rcsprinter123/Creations/my articles.

And yes, I do feel you have learned a lot and maybe it is time for you to move on. I am always here to ask any questions or just have a chat with, and this page will remain open. As this wasn't really an adoption programme for the reasons I think I explained at the top, I'm not going to graduate you but dismiss you from my services officially. I will help with the article too when I have time. Nice knowing you. Cheers, Rcsprinter (natter) 16:55, 17 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Another question

Nope. Why do you ask? Rcsprinter (talk to me) 20:02, 7 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

A bad idea, that's all. -— Isarra ༆ 05:28, 9 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User:Rcsprinter123/Adopt/Isarra&oldid=1056743953"