This is a Wikipediauser page. This is not an encyclopedia article or the talk page for an encyclopedia article. If you find this page on any site other than Wikipedia, you are viewing a mirror site. Be aware that the page may be outdated and that the user whom this page is about may have no personal affiliation with any site other than Wikipedia. The original page is located at https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Timotheus_Canens.
This user has been identified as anAwesome Wikipedianand was awarded his own day.
trout
.
This editor is a Labutnum of the Encyclopedia and is entitled to display this Book of Knowledge with Coffee Cup Stain, Cigarette Burn, Chewed Broken Pencil, Sticky Note, Bookmark, and Note from Jimbo.
WP:BITE. So thanks for taking the time at the user's talk page. hamiltonstone (talk
) 03:33, 28 August 2009 (UTC)
The Original Barnstar
For "taking care of" (for want of a better phrase) of the stub Her Fearful Symmetry. Your edits do not go unnoticed. Take care!--Delta1989 (talk) 01:38, 11 October 2009 (UTC)
The Original Barnstar
For your great work in doing non-admin AfD closures and relisting debates and your overall work in the deletion area of Wikipedia, I award you the Original Barnstar. Your hard work definitely takes some of the pressure and workload off of our continually shrinking team of admins. Great work and keep it up, Tim! Timmeh 03:29, 14 November 2009 (UTC)
The Articles for Creation barnstar
For your seemingly unending dedication and contributions to the
Articles for Creation process, I, Thisisborin9, hereby award you this barnstar (interesting design!). Congrats! Thisisborin9
if I do not reply soon. 06:13, 12 September 2011 (UTC)
The Surreal Barnstar
Regardless of my opinion on the way I feel the situation should have been handled, your action was
boldness personified. too many admins sit on their hands, afraid to do what needs to be done, when it needs to be done. You took the path less traveled and made a difficult decision that needed to be made. Bravo. Trusilver
Est omnino difficile iudicare inclusionis meritum cuiusdam rei in encyclopædia cum ratio sciendi quid populi referat incerta sit, sed nihilominus aliquid encyclopædiam dedecet
It is generally difficult to judge the worthiness of a particular topic for inclusion in an encyclopedia considering that there is no certain way to know what interests people, but some topics nevertheless are not fit for an encyclopedia.
This motto reflects the desire of these Wikipedians to be reluctant, but not entirely unwilling, to remove articles from Wikipedia.