User talk:אגם רפאלי

Hello! אגם רפאלי, I noticed your article was declined at Articles for Creation, and that can be disappointing. If you are wondering or curious about why your article submission was declined please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Mr. Guye (talk) 01:19, 4 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, אגם רפאלי. It has been over six months since you last edited your

The page will shortly be deleted. If you plan on editing the page to address the issues raised when it was declined and resubmit it, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}} or {{db-g13}} code. Please note that Articles for Creation is not for indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you want to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Rich^T|C|E-Mail 22:32, 21 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks, as per my request on the talk page.

Psychonaut according to the regulations I planned on adding the disclaimer on the edit summary. Due to your request I added it to my user profile. This contribution is indeed paid and I will disclose it according to the policy. Is that a reason to not remove the protection? I feel like the content is not of advertising character. Do you feel otherwise? אגם רפאלי (talk) 08:53, 2 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for your candour concerning your payment for this contribution. It is possible that your contribution could stand on its own merits, though that is not the only criterion which is used here to determine whether or not a page should be kept. Could you please answer my first question about whether you operate or have operated any other accounts here that have been used to add Checkmarx-related material to Wikipedia? —Psychonaut (talk) 10:29, 2 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Psychonaut again, apologies for not mentioning this. I have only operated one Wikipedia editor account in my life and it is this one. I have no other contacts or communication with Checkmarx, wikipedia or non-wikipedia related. Specifically those edits are not mine. אגם רפאלי (talk) 13:00, 2 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Psychonaut can I bubble this issue up again? אגם רפאלי (talk) 18:33, 5 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry, I've been offline for a while. Thanks for responding to my question about your links (or lack thereof) to the other Checkmarx accounts. I see that you've since posted an Articles for Creation for your article, which is good. But did you remember to comply with the requirements for disclosure of paid editing? You wrote above that your Checkmarx contribution is "indeed paid", but your user page still says that "I don't have any paid contributions". A draft contribution is still a contribution, so please make sure you perform the disclosure now. (If you've already done so somewhere else and I've overlooked it, please let me know.) —Psychonaut (talk) 11:26, 10 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Psychonaut I have now updated my user page. The case of whether a draft is a contribution or not was a little murky on the policy pages. Thank you for the clarification. Can you now help me approve the article? אגם רפאלי (talk) 16:53, 10 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for adding the disclosure. (I note you linked to the wrong page, though, so I fixed the link—hope you don't mind.) As for improving the page, I haven't yet reviewed it in detail, but will do so if I can find the time. I see that another user has already nominated the draft for deletion, so that should attract some more attention to it in any case. If other editors here believe that it can be improved to the point that it meets all our basic criteria, then it will be kept (and those improvements will be made, or at least set out in detail in the discussion). —Psychonaut (talk) 17:23, 12 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you. Anything you can do to help me speed up the review process? :) אגם רפאלי (talk) 15:57, 6 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by CatcherStorm was:

This submission's references do not adequately show the subject's notability. Wikipedia requires significant coverage about the subject in

notable

and worthy of inclusion in an encyclopedia. If additional reliable sources cannot be found for the subject, then it may not be suitable for Wikipedia at this time.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Checkmarx and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
• You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

CatcherStorm ^talk 15:57, 6 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by SwisterTwister was:

This submission's references do not adequately show the subject's notability. Wikipedia requires significant coverage about the subject in

notable

and worthy of inclusion in an encyclopedia. If additional reliable sources cannot be found for the subject, then it may not be suitable for Wikipedia at this time.

 The comment the reviewer left was:

Our policies are especially critical of such young companies (such as in the past 10 years, as is this case), because it suggests it's simply too soon, especially putting aside the usual time-area where they needed funding, support, etc.; the sources are all simple business announcements, mentions, etc., and even the TimesofIsrael is simply not enough for what we need in notability, As our policies state, there's no automatic inherited notability from anything or anyone since all Drafts are judged by their own merits.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Checkmarx and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
• You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

SwisterTwister talk 04:18, 7 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Checkmarx. Thanks! SwisterTwister talk 17:31, 7 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, אגם רפאלי. You have new messages at CatcherStorm's talk page.
Message added 17:32, 7 February 2017 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.[reply]

CatcherStorm ^talk 17:32, 7 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Checkmarx. Thanks! SwisterTwister talk 04:43, 25 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by DavidWestT was:

This submission's references do not adequately show the subject's notability. Wikipedia requires significant coverage about the subject in

notable

and worthy of inclusion in an encyclopedia. If additional reliable sources cannot be found for the subject, then it may not be suitable for Wikipedia at this time.

 The comment the reviewer left was:

After a thorough review, I'm just not seeing significant coverage of the subject. While the list of outlets that have covered the company are impressive, practically all coverage is short or cursory or in a listicle format.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Checkmarx and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
• You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

DavidWestT (talk) 07:25, 30 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hello אגם רפאלי,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Anat Rafaeli for deletion, because the article doesn't clearly say why the subject is important enough to be included in an encyclopedia.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions.

Killer Moff (talk) 15:02, 3 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Anat Rafaeli, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Queues. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:01, 4 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Checkmarx. Thanks! SwisterTwister talk 06:17, 5 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Zppix was:

This submission's references do not adequately show the subject's notability. Wikipedia requires significant coverage (not just mere mentions) about the subject in published,

notable

and worthy of inclusion in an encyclopedia. If additional reliable sources cannot be found for the subject, then it may not be suitable for Wikipedia at this time.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Checkmarx and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
• You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Ⓩⓟⓟⓘⓧ _Talk 22:30, 6 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:Checkmarx, a page you created, has not been edited in 5 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at

Thank you for your attention.

Hello, אגם רפאלי. It has been over six months since you last edited the

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. JMHamo (talk) 23:38, 19 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for creating

Wikipedia editor Doomsdayer520 just reviewed your page, and wrote this note for you:

Thanks for your new article on Noam Inbar. Note that reference #5 needs to be fixed.

To reply, leave a comment on Doomsdayer520's talk page.

Learn more about

---DOOMSDAYER520 (Talk|Contribs) 19:34, 17 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for the review. Fixed reference #5. אגם רפאלי (talk) 08:43, 20 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Praxidicae (talk) 19:36, 5 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Alan Feld is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Alan Feld until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Praxidicae (talk) 14:54, 6 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm Justlettersandnumbers. I noticed that you made an edit concerning content related to a living (or recently deceased) person on Alan Feld, but you didn't support your changes with a citation to a reliable source, so I removed it. Wikipedia has a very strict policy concerning how we write about living people, so please help us keep such articles accurate and clear. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you! Justlettersandnumbers (talk) 16:08, 6 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I've also removed similarly unsourced personal detail from

independent reliable sources

. This raises the question of where you got the information from, and why you didn't include a citation to the source you found it in?

I see that you have disclosed some paid-editing contributions; does your list of paid work need to be updated? – it seems to be incomplete. Please remember that

disclosure is mandatory. Thank you, Justlettersandnumbers (talk) 16:21, 6 May 2020 (UTC)[reply

]

Hello, אגם רפאלי. It has been over six months since you last edited the

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 16:24, 5 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm

• A "bare URL and missing title" error. References show this error when they do not have a title. Please edit the article to add the appropriate title parameter to the reference. (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a

Hello! Voting in the

2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users

are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The

topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy

describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review

NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:42, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply

]