User talk:虹易

Hello, 虹易, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions, especially your edits to Proof of space. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:

You may also want to complete the Wikipedia Adventure, an interactive tour that will help you learn the basics of editing Wikipedia. You can visit the Teahouse to ask questions or seek help.

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask for help on your talk page, and a volunteer should respond shortly. Again, welcome! –MJL ‐Talk‐^☖ 03:45, 20 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, 虹易,

Please do not tag pages for speedy deletion, CSD G5, unless the page creator is the confirmed, blocked sockpuppet of a ban evading editor. It might be helpful for you to review

@Liz:Hi, Liz. Thanks for your kind advice and I feel sorry for that. The two deletion discussions were opened by myself earlier because I did not know there is a G5 criteria. So when I learned about G5, I was trying to let discussions quickly end since there did not seem to be worth much discussing. Now I realize these actions are inappropriate. With respect to 89Football, I supposed its creator Roogérs.Joosé was globally blocked while it is not yet. Previous SRCU on meta (m:Steward_requests/Checkuser#Stella_Phang.40zh.wikipedia) has confirmed a group of sockpuppets technically which includes this account. But I just notice the fact that neither the steward nor CU of enwiki have confirmed the relation between that group and WP:Sockpuppet_investigations/123Aristotle/Archive#06_January_2022. I am going to seek the help of CU or stewards to check that.--虹易 (talk) 07:01, 8 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Following up from your question here [1] about 123Aristotle, I'd assume the reason why they're not locked is that nobody's reported them to m:SRG yet - you're free to do that yourself. If you're unsure about the relationship of these accounts to the master, I'd ask Sotiale at SRCU. Spicy (talk) 10:13, 8 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Shanghai police database leak is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Shanghai police database leak until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Hello! Voting in the

2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users

are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The

topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy

describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review

NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:48, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply

]