I hope you enjoy editing here and being a
Marek.69 talk 03:25, 23 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Well, I felt I had to step in when I saw you were being given erroneous information about Anglican doctrine:) Glad to have helped. "Henrican" is indeed a word, but much less common than Elizabethan, and most people would be confused on first seeing it.... - Nunh-huh 05:01, 12 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Just a matter of curiosity, how is your name pronounced? Either IPA ot standard English syllables would be useful. Thanks. Bielle (talk) 00:28, 11 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Re: this edit --- thanks for the edit, but please keep in mind that
Thanks buddy for answering my question!174.3.107.176 (talk) 13:53, 14 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Kurdistan is not a state but the truth of 40 million Kurds exists. Also it is not fair to sacrifice everything about newroz for the benefit of Persians. Even Persians themselves confirm that Kurds are much ancient than them in the Mesopotamia region. The reality is that Newroz is like Zoroast of a Kurdish origin. I am not bias about Kurds but I am against sacrificing truth for any purpose. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Cyrus abdi (talk • contribs) 08:05, 19 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
I did not mean you sacrifice anything. I meant by that Persians are monopolizing it and some other people who don't know the truth simply confirm it. Unfortunately due to lack of powerful Kurdish state many things in their culture have been stolen. In Iraq and Turkey and Syria, it is only the Kurds who know what is newroz and celebrate it as part of their cultural identity. But even in the UN resolution there is no mention of Kurds. Turkish government has banned newroz and even the letter "W" which is absent in their alphabet, but now UN resolution has idiotically mentioned the name of Turkey as a celebrator of Newroz.
Newroz fire was first set in Babylon (today southern Iraq) more than 6000 years ago. --Cyrus abdi (talk) 08:19, 19 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
No that's fine as is. Some editors like to work on stubs so having them listed in there makes the stubs easier to find. at the same time having them in the regular category makes it easier for other editors and readers to find. something lame from CBW 04:27, 21 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks for the offer and sorry for the delay. The main reason I have the Chinese-0 box is because I sometimes edit chinese culture articles and do not want somebody to think I actually know the language. I'm slightly familiar with the different dialects and the difference between traditional characters and pinion. If you would like to send me some resources on how to better understand the language that would be nice. - Stillwaterising (talk) 01:44, 27 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
I'm not sure how "Diho" came to be. I'm not sure if it's from another dialect, or if the guy wanted a slightly different or easier-to-pronounce English name... WhisperToMe (talk) 21:25, 28 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Hello, I reverted your edit to the Current Events Portal today which created Religion as a subheader. I agree that "Religion" is a little more accurate than "Arts, culture and entertainment", but we can't wantonly create a subheader for every possible topic. The idea is to split it up into categories. While Religion has been considered as a subcategory, we feel it would be hit too rarely, and thus would fall under other subcategories (Law & Crime for the abuse scandals, AC&E for religious festivals, etc., or "Other Current Events" for events that don't fit into other subcategories). Please don't restore your change without first conferring with other Current Events editors. If you'd like to argue for Religion as a subcategory, please visit the Current Events Portal Reform Taskforce Page (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Kiteinthewind/Current_Events_Portal_Reform_Taskforce). Thanks! Blue Crest (talk) 20:58, 13 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Hi
Just to let you know that material in the lead does not have to be cited.
There are two ways to write the lead - one with citations and one without
All information in the lead should be in the body of the article and cited. If this is not so then the material should be tagged in the obody or a section started in the talk page where you can tell the editors of the problems you have found
Norwich, like almost all English towns and cities, have their oldest areas in the middle. It is uncommon and pretty rare that a city would not have this feature. They are usually from Roman, Saxon or Mediaevil times.
Chaosdruid (talk) 20:25, 3 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Hi, You appear to be eligible to vote in the current