User talk:173.66.193.159

Page contents not supported in other languages.
Source: Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.


Recent edit to
Maude Valerie White

Hello, and thank you for your recent contribution. I appreciate the effort you made for our project, but unfortunately I had to undo your edit because I believe the article was better before you made that change. Feel free to contact me directly if you have any questions. Thank you! ―Susmuffin Talk 23:26, 27 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at
RKS Design
(May 27)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by DGG was:
This submission appears to
independent, reliable, published sources, not just to materials produced by the creator of the subject being discussed. This is important so that the article can meet Wikipedia's verifiability policy and the notability
of the subject can be established. If you still feel that this subject is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia, please rewrite your submission to comply with these policies.
 The comment the reviewer left was:
At present, yes, the references might be good enough for notability for a proper article, but the article is too promotional to be accepted. At the least it needs to sort out the minor material and minor awards. -- and look at ref 8--I wonder from where this material was copied.

It has never been settled whether being the subject of an hbs case study amounts to notable .

This would need to be rewritten from scratch
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
DGG ( talk ) 05:57, 27 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Teahouse logo
Hello, 173.66.193.159! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! DGG ( talk ) 05:57, 27 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at
RKS Design
(July 24)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Timtrent was:
This submission appears to
independent, reliable, published sources, not just to materials produced by the creator of the subject being discussed. This is important so that the article can meet Wikipedia's verifiability policy and the notability
of the subject can be established. If you still feel that this subject is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia, please rewrite your submission to comply with these policies.
 The comment the reviewer left was:
DKS might be notable in a Wikipedia sense, but the references do not demonstrate that to me. I'm concerned to see that almost all have a PR feel. The LAT and the CT seem much more useful. Try not to show their portfolio as if you are selling them to a client
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
FiddleTimtrent FaddleTalk to me 19:51, 24 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:173.66.193.159&oldid=1035287635"